Mark Driscoll built one of the most influential — and most infamous — pulpits in American evangelicalism, preaching a version of Christian masculinity that filled Mars Hill Church before it became a cautionary tale that's still shaping how the church talks about strength, leadership, and accountability today. The Jeremy Boreing Show interviewed Mark this week, causing considerable controversy online. On this episode of Wednesday Live, Jeremy Boreing sits down with former Babylon Bee Managing Editor Joel Berry, pastor, cultural commentator, and Boreing Media President Jon Lewis, and Executive Producer Alyssa Cordova to ask the harder question behind the Driscoll story: What does Christian leadership really look like, and can the church even recognize it anymore? The conversation ends with Jeremy's new Prime Video series The Pendragon Cycle: Rise of the Merlin (the #1 fantasy series in the US and the UK) and the argument that conservatives are good at complaining and bad at building. From there, the vandalism of the West's founding myths, and whether modern Evangelicalism has what it takes to lead. Support the show and shave with a company that doesn't hate you: https://www.jeremysrazors.com/ Watch The Pendragon Cycle: Rise of the Merlin, now streaming on Prime Video: https://linkly.link/2sVeT 0:00 – Company Update & the Driscoll Backlash 6:05 – Is Driscoll Biblically Disqualified? 14:34 – The Feminization of the Church & Paul's Example 28:06 – The Christianity Today Podcast & Scapegoating 39:48 – Ambition, Idolatry & Trusting God Over Men 55:10 – Q&A: NDAs and Protecting the Church 1:17:00 – Critics, Mike Winger & Defending Paul 1:37:44 – Rebuilding Razors with AI & Filmmaking 2:02:03 – Q&A, Pendragon Stories & Closing Monologue Subscribe for new episodes of Wednesday Live every week. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Pastor Mark Driscoll — founder of the once-influential Mars Hill Church in Seattle, who resigned amid scandal in 2014 and now leads the fast-growing Trinity Church in Scottsdale, Arizona — joins Jeremy for a two-hour conversation that doesn't blink. Support the show and shave with a company that doesn't hate you: https://www.jeremysrazors.com/ They start with the crisis: Gen Z men drowning in porn, gambling, and video games, a church that's been "over-mothered and under-fathered" since the men came home from World War II, and a seeker-sensitive movement that made Sunday morning safe for everyone except the men who needed it most. From there the conversation goes everywhere — the politics of the pulpit, why Gen Z is drawn to liturgy and structure instead of comfort, the Exodus story as a blueprint for what happens when believers exit the public square, and Driscoll's own account of the Mars Hill collapse: the hacking, the extortion, the fake confession sent to his entire mailing list, and the eighteen years of his own sermons he had to buy back at auction. The back half is about forgiveness — not as a feeling, but as a decision, using the story of Joseph as the frame: "The deeper the forgiving, the greater the anointing." Jeremy pushes Driscoll on the difference between forgiving someone and trusting them again, and Driscoll closes with his answer to the question he says he asks every pastor who comes on the show: what is the gospel? 0:00 - The Masculinity Crisis in the Church 8:12 - Why the Church Became Feminized 16:05 - Seeker-Sensitive vs God-Centered 23:34 - Make Disciples, Not Converts 34:18 - Egypt, Exodus & Political Freedom 53:24 - Controversy, Scandal & Candace Owens 1:05:20 - The Fall & Rebuilding of Mars Hill 1:32:06 - Total Forgiveness: The Joseph Story 1:54:06 - Gen Z, Tate Brothers & the Gospel 2:08:18 - What Is the Gospel? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Feat. Dr. Richard Gallagher, Jenn Nizza, and Billy Hallowell Three weeks ago on this show, Rod Dreher told us the story of the night he tried to help Tucker Carlson after a demonic encounter — four bleeding claw marks, two exorcists offered, help refused. Tonight we go further. Vice President JD Vance says he doesn't think UFOs are aliens — he thinks they're demons. Nearly a third of Americans consult astrology, tarot, or a fortune teller every year. More than half of teenagers do. And at the same moment this conversation is opening up in serious ways, Candace Owens is running what looks like a demonically driven campaign against a grieving widow — claiming Charlie Kirk visits her in dreams, that the two of them practiced astral projection, and telling a viewer last week: "we are legion." Something real is breaking open in American culture. The guardrails are nowhere. Tonight, three guests who can actually tell the difference between spiritual warfare and a personality disorder: DR. RICHARD GALLAGHER — board-certified psychiatrist, professor at New York Medical College, and the longest-standing American member of the International Association of Exorcists. He has personally evaluated more suspected possession cases than any other physician in the world. Author of "Demonic Foes" (HarperCollins, 2020). JENN NIZZA — spent 25 years as a professional psychic medium, starting at age 13. Now warns audiences about the occult on The Ex-Psychic Saved Podcast. Author of "Darkness in Disguise," "Rescued from Demons," and more. BILLY HALLOWELL — 20-year investigative journalist covering faith and the supernatural for CBN News. Director of the 2026 documentary "Investigating the Supernatural: Angels & Demons." Author of "Playing with Fire." We cover: what separates a real demonic case from a psychiatric one; how psychic "accuracy" actually works; what happened when Tucker refused help; how Candace Owens is weaponizing spiritual language against Charlie Kirk's widow; why the American church went silent on the unseen world — and what to do about it. 00:00:00 – Tucker's Demonic Attack & the National Spiritual Moment 00:04:42 – Meet the Guests & Is This Actually Increasing? 00:08:52 – Jen's Life as a Psychic Medium — and Her Deliverance 00:12:30 – Body and Spirit: Can Oppression Cause Physical Harm? 00:19:34 – Cultural Scientism & the Church's Retreat 00:42:52 – Curses, Vulnerability & Psychedelics 01:03:22 – Why Now? Tucker, Candace & Spiritual Contagion 01:28:41 – Gallagher's Most Dramatic Cases 01:44:34 – Closing: Ephesians 6 & the Gospel Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

America's pastors have retreated from politics — and the wolves walked right in. In this monologue, Jeremy Boreing makes the case that the collapse of the American church, from the seeker-sensitive movement to the silence on porn, gambling, and feminine sin, is why the culture is coming apart. Subscribe for new episodes of The Jeremy Boreing Show — it's the single biggest thing you can do to help this message reach more people. Young men chant for Andrew Tate outside a jail. Four hundred women in pink rally for a mother who strangled her three children. Charlie Kirk stood in the public square doing the watchman's work in a country with a church on every corner — and was killed doing it. What were the pastors doing? Jeremy traces the rot back to its source: George Whitefield and the Great Awakening, Bill Hybels and Willow Creek's "unchurched Harry," the 2007 REVEAL study that proved the model failed, and the audience capture that turned pulpits into comment sections. Then he takes on the other error — Christian nationalism, integralism, Adrian Vermeule, Stephen Wolfe, and "measured theocratic Caesarism" — and argues the Constitution didn't fail us. We failed it. The alternative is neither retreat nor theocracy: a church courageous enough to make Christians, Christians courageous enough to govern themselves, and citizens courageous enough to govern their country. 00:00 Intro: Tate Protests vs. Clancy Vigil 04:24 Whitfield and the Great Awakening 07:21 Rise of Seeker-Sensitive Christianity 15:45 Gambling, Porn, and Pulpit Silence 23:22 Christian Nationalism Rising 29:43 A Call to Pastors Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Featuring Jessica Reed Kraus (@houseinhabit), Jonathan Alpert, and Ericka Andersen. A courtroom in Plymouth, Massachusetts, is hearing the Lindsay Clancy murder case. But Jeremy Boreing argues the more revealing story is not inside the courtroom at all — it is the parallel universe that has assembled around it online, where thousands of women who have never read a legal filing have watched a few hours of true-crime video and concluded they have solved a case that seventy witnesses could not settle. This week's Wednesday live panel takes that phenomenon as the entry point into a much larger question: what is actually happening to women in America, and is there a way back? Jeremy makes the case that the online response to this trial is not an isolated curiosity but a symptom — of a country that has medicated women at extraordinary rates, watched women's drinking climb for two decades, built a billion-dollar market in explicit fiction, and handed millions of women an ecosystem that rewards suspicion, grievance, and resentment while penalizing trust, connection, and accountability. As Alex Clark put it on X, idle people are easy to radicalize, and women who are not plugged into community are sitting prey. Jeremy argues she is right — and that this eventually reaches the ballot box. Three guests take that question from three genuinely different vantage points. Jonathan Alpert is a psychotherapist with two decades of clinical practice in New York and Washington, D.C., and the author of Therapy Nation: How America Got Hooked on Therapy and Why It's Left Us More Anxious and Divided. He is the clinical insider making an argument against his own field: that despite unprecedented access to therapy, anxiety and depression are at record highs, and that words like trauma, boundaries, toxic, and self-care escaped the consulting room and were weaponized in the culture. He walks Jeremy through the mechanism — how a clinical tool becomes a cultural weapon, why women became the primary consumers of therapeutic language, and what that has produced. Jessica Reed Kraus — known to more than a million followers as @houseinhabit — is an independent journalist who has covered high-profile trials from the inside, from the Britney Spears conservatorship to Ghislaine Maxwell to Harvey Weinstein. She reports on the online world under discussion as both observer and professional participant, and as a mother of four. She describes what she actually sees when she looks at trial TikTok, true-crime fan communities, and the conspiracy ecosystems Jeremy is criticizing — and what it looks like to work online without being consumed by it. Ericka Andersen is a conservative writer, WORLD Magazine columnist, and the author of Reason to Return: Why Women Need the Church and the Church Needs Women and Freely Sober: Rethinking Alcohol Through the Lens of Faith. She argues that roughly 16 million women have left the church over the last decade and did not find nothing in its place — they found something else. She makes the faith-and-community case for what heals, and speaks from her own history of poverty, trauma, and recovery. Alpert diagnoses in clinical language and locates the failure in institutions. Andersen locates the cure in faith, church, and embodied community. Kraus reports from inside the ecosystem without either vocabulary. Jeremy pushes all three toward the uncomfortable version of the argument, including the consistency test: if men were forming parasocial fan clubs around accused murderers and building theories out of a few hours of video, we would call it radicalization without hesitating. The conversation closes on one concrete thing a woman watching could do in her actual life — not online. 00:00:00 – Jeremy's Razors & the Lindsay Clancy Case 00:07:22 – Meet the Guests: Women in Crisis Online 00:16:22 – Gnosticism, Lost Community & Coddled Kids 00:33:18 – Postpartum Psychosis & Victimhood Culture 00:44:32 – AI, Algorithms & Destination Vices 01:03:16 – Diagnosis Culture: Sin & Diluted Language 01:16:47 – Satan as Accuser: Candace, Tucker & Evil 01:20:22 – Rebuilding Trust & Family Estrangement 01:37:53 – COVID's Legacy & Finding Real Hope Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Andrew Klavan joins Jeremy Boreing for a wide-ranging conversation on faith, AI, and the cultural moment we're living through. They talk about why optimism is still justified despite civil war on the right and rising socialism on the left, why AI is a "mechanical sociopath" with no soul and never will be, and why the revival of faith may come not from the pews but from scientists and intellectuals finally admitting the math doesn't work without God. *** Support the show and shave with a company that doesn't hate you: https://www.jeremysrazors.com/ *** Klavan opens up about losing a decade of his life to mental illness, the eerie experience of losing an entire manuscript twice during moments of spiritual significance, and how Dostoevsky's "Crime and Punishment" changed the course of his life at 19. The conversation moves through the death of woke Hollywood and the rise of "post-woke" art, the failures and strange virtues of the boomer generation, the coddling of Gen Z, and a frank debate about where art crosses the line into pornography versus honest depiction of the human condition. They close with a look ahead to the 2026 midterms, whether AOC is as dangerous as she is talented, and why Klavan is worried — but not opposed to — JD Vance. 0:00 – Optimism Amid Chaos 3:15 – Faith Revival on the Horizon 13:40 – Reality, Madness & Political Christianity 24:59 – Suffering, Suicide & the Soul 41:11 – Trump, Agency & Government Overreach 57:23 – AI, Jobs & the Soul Question 1:04:21 – Klavan's Illness & His Novels 1:13:01 – Faith in Fiction & Hollywood 1:41:09 – Art's Line & the 2026 Midterms Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

A college student complained he couldn't afford a $20 burrito. A senior producer replied that his wife feeds a family of eight homemade burritos for less than that. Twelve million views later, the American right was at war with itself over whether the affordability crisis is real — and whether anyone on the right is allowed to say so out loud. On this Wednesday Live panel, Jeremy Boreing sits down with the three men who got the facts right and still watched the room turn on them. Joel Berry — Marine Corps veteran, former managing editor of The Babylon Bee, author of the bestselling The Postmodern Pilgrim's Progress, and senior producer of this show — wrote the post that started it. David Harsanyi, founding editor of The Federalist and senior writer at the Washington Examiner, has spent the week making the data case that food inflation has returned to something close to its historical norm. Daniel Di Martino, Venezuelan-born economist, Manhattan Institute fellow, and founder of the Dissident Project, watched socialism destroy what was once the fourth-richest country in the world — and argues the American shortage was built by government and can be unbuilt by it. The numbers set up the problem. The July inflation report released this morning put headline CPI at 3.4 percent annually and core at 2.5 percent, both down slightly from June. Food inflation over the last two years has run near 3 percent a year. The acute spike that began in 2021 and crested in 2022 is over. And yet a July Washington Post poll of nearly 2,700 adults found 65 percent of Americans calling grocery prices unaffordable — including 56 percent of households earning more than $100,000 a year. Why the gap? Because the rate of increase came back down and the prices never did. Grocery prices are up roughly 30 percent since the pandemic. A twenty-two-year-old who paid seven-fifty for a Chipotle burrito in high school now pays eleven-sixty. That is a complaint about the price level, not the rate of change — and as Cato's Ryan Bourne argues, telling people to cook cheaper substitutes may be the political equivalent of Jimmy Carter telling Americans to put on a sweater. This hour is the argument the right has been avoiding: how to say a true thing without insulting the person who needs to hear it. The panel works through the dispersion hiding under the headline numbers, the four categories where the real pain lives — housing, healthcare, tuition, childcare — and the policy levers that actually move prices. Di Martino makes the housing supply case in plain English: zoning, parking mandates, permitting. He also says on the record that lifting tariffs is the fastest available lever on goods prices, which puts him crosswise with the current administration. Harsanyi defends the historical context: food's share of the family budget has fallen from roughly 42 percent in 1901 to under 10 percent today. Berry connects affordability to family formation, marriage, and birth rates — and to why economic populism captured a large share of the party instead of the case for cutting spending, taxes, regulation, and entitlements. Then there are the stakes. Zohran Mamdani won New York City on a cost-of-living platform, and DSA candidates are gaining ground elsewhere on the same pitch. His argument was never that the right is cruel. It was that nothing has been tried. Did the right hand him that? And is it about to hand somebody else the midterms? The hour closes on the hardest version of the question. A family of eight can eat well on twenty dollars if somebody is home to cook. What is the answer in a household where nobody is — two working parents, no time, no margin? Each guest names the one thing he would remove rather than add to make American life cheaper. Subscribe for full episodes, monologues, and panels from The Jeremy Boreing Show. 00:00:00 – Inflation Report & the Great Burrito Battle 00:05:13 – The Burrito Tweet, Backlash & COVID's Lasting Damage 00:14:32 – Is the Right Embracing Left-Wing Economics? 00:21:14 – Entitlements, Freedom & the Value of Struggle 00:38:20 – Marriage, Divorce & the Real Affordability Crisis 00:42:27 – College Debt & the Broken University System 01:05:14 – Congress, the Administrative State & Trump's Record 01:20:47 – Obama's Legacy, Socialism & American Exceptionalism 01:41:36 – Raising Conservative Kids & the Conservative Message Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Two trials are running in America right now. One is in a Fourth District courtroom in Provo, Utah, where prosecutors have spent months building the case against Tyler Robinson the hard way — eyewitness testimony, hours of security footage, forensic reports, DNA, handwriting on a shell casing, a .30-06 rifle. Slow, methodical, adversarial, and bound by rules. The accused is presumed innocent. The evidence has to survive cross-examination. The other trial is happening behind a podcast microphone. It has no judge, no jury, no burden of proof, and no standard for what counts as evidence. In that trial, the verdict is set by likes and shares, insight arrives as gossip and hearsay, and the culprit changes week to week. Millions of people are watching it and believing it. In this monologue, Jeremy Boreing argues that the distance between those two rooms is the distance between Western civilization and everything that came before it — and that we are walking backwards across it faster than most people realize. Jeremy starts with a viral video out of Dearborn, Michigan, and Allie Beth Stuckey's response to it, then widens the lens: the physical walls at the border are not the only ones crumbling. The walls in our minds are cracking too. Cross-cultural researchers describe the West as a guilt/innocence culture — an objective moral code, applied to everyone, where justice is blind and the claim outranks the man. Most of the world runs on honor and shame instead, where your worth is issued by the people watching and can be revoked by them, where an unanswered insult is a kind of social death, and where the sneer isn't a failure to make an argument — the sneer is the argument. That framework, drawn from the work of psychologists Angela K.-Y. Leung and Dov Cohen, explains an enormous amount about the American public square in 2026: why ad hominem now reads as authority, why the Republican primary debates of 2016 went the way they did, why Candace Owens told Andrew Wilson that objective debate standards are for the soft, and why the mob's verdict has quietly replaced the evidence. From there, Jeremy makes the case for how strange the West actually is — starting with the price tag. A fixed price is not natural. Corruption is natural. The haggle is natural. What the West built instead was impersonal exchange: contracts a court would enforce, property a king couldn't seize, honest weights and measures commanded by the God of Israel and enforced for centuries by a Church that treated cheating a stranger as a matter for your soul. Nobel-winning economist Douglass North traced the explosion of Western prosperity to that structure. Harvard anthropologist Joseph Henrich traced it back further — to the medieval Church banning cousin marriage, dissolving the clan, and creating something genuinely new in human history: the individual. And it explains John Adams, who defended the British soldiers after the Boston Massacre because he believed the truth was owed even to the enemy of his own people — and lost half his law practice for it. It explains a mother and father in southern Utah who looked at a surveillance image, recognized their own son, and drove him to the sheriff's office themselves. Set that against Tucker Carlson's 2015 rule that he would never criticize his brother in public, under any circumstances, even for mass murder. That's the tribe placed above the truth. Blood over justice. Half the world would hear it and nod. Jeremy's argument: the Left says the transaction was always theft, so take yours back. The post-liberal Right, borrowing from Carl Schmitt, says the tribe was always the point, so reward friends and punish enemies. Different roads, same destination — and neither is offering anything new. They are offering what everybody had before Christianity showed up. None of it was inevitable, and none of it is irreversible. We built the fixed price. We built the jury. We built the father who turns in his own son. Those were choices, and choices can be made differently tomorrow. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Weds LIVE guests: James Lindsay, Ryan Mauro, J Michael Waller Tucker Carlson has told the Columbia Journalism Review he intends to help build a third party, calling the American government "a one-party state posing as a democracy" that "needs to be broken." Marjorie Taylor Greene, Thomas Massie, Joe Kent, and Brian Glenn have now been photographed around Carlson's table, with Greene declaring that "the movement has begun." Jeremy has been making one argument about Tucker Carlson for a long time, and it wasn't the popular one. The popular argument on the right is that Tucker is a grifter — that he says whatever the audience wants to hear because the audience pays for it. Jeremy's argument has been the opposite, and it is more troubling: Tucker isn't chasing a check. He's building something. A political project with a coherent shape — socially conservative, economically left of the Republican Party, and organized around opposition to Israel and to American power abroad. That political project isn't merely an organic movement. It's the result of hostile foreign actors who have been working, through division and chaos, to take down the West for decades. James Lindsay — mathematician, co-author of Cynical Theories, founder of New Discourses, and the man who popularized the term "woke right" — returns to the show to trace the philosophical chain. In April 2024, Carlson sat in Moscow with Aleksandr Dugin, who has been under American sanctions since 2015, and let Dugin tell a Christian audience that transgenderism, the assault on the family, and the transhumanist project all descend from the Protestant Reformation. Carlson's response: "What you're describing is clearly happening, and it's horrifying." Lindsay explains why you cannot accept that diagnosis without swallowing the prescription — and why, if the Reformation was the original error, the American founding becomes the disease rather than the cure. J. Michael Waller — author of 'Big Intel' and 'Secret Empire: The KGB in Russia Today,' president of Georgetown Research, who learned Soviet disinformation tradecraft from defector Ladislav Bittman — supplies the operational history. Soviet theorists called the move reflexive control: you don't tell your adversary what to do, you shape what he believes about himself until he chooses your objective and calls it his own idea. Waller walks through his "Ten Points to Understand Alexandr Dugin," including Dugin's own stated goal of "the destruction of the American empire," and why multipolarity has always been a scam. Power isn't shared between superpowers. Somebody is always in charge. Ryan Mauro — senior fellow for counter-extremism at the Capital Research Center, president of the Mauro Institute — brings the current reporting. Mauro broke the story placing Candace Owens on the SPIEF program in Russia. He also investigated the woman Carlson introduced to his audience as Elizabeth Lane; according to a report from The Insider, her name is Iza Bendianishvili and her romantic partner is an FSB officer. When Carlson raised the intelligence allegations on air, he said: "I just wanna say out loud, I don't care." Mauro will explain what he found, and what happened when Lane learned he was looking. The right spent fifteen years learning to recognize ideological capture arriving from the left. The question this hour asks is whether it missed the same thing arriving from the east — and whether a third party organized around contempt for the American inheritance is a conservative project at all, or a very old one wearing conservative clothes. Also discussed: the collapse of journalistic guardrails and who is left to monitor any of this; whether institutional distrust on the right now runs on the same mechanism as critical theory; and concrete habits for the viewer who no longer trusts a single institutional source. Subscribe for new episodes of The Jeremy Boreing Show. New Wednesday Live panels weekly. 00:00:00 – Tucker's Speech: First Reactions 00:09:10 – Platforming Elizabeth Lane & Alexander Dugin 00:19:10 – Mondialism and the Fourth Political Theory 00:33:07 – Putin, Tsarist Christianity & the Katechon Prophecy 00:52:14 – Honor Culture and the Nazi Ideology Parallel 01:19:10 – Why Young Men Are Drawn to Strongman Politics 01:24:28 – The Real Failure: Mondialism, Not the West 01:36:13 – Tucker vs. Trump & the JD Vance Question 01:48:02 – Grading Tucker's 10-Point Vision Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Friday LIVE guests: Michael Knowles, Josh Herr, Dr. Simone Gold For five years, the conservative movement has been right about COVID — about the schools, the mandates, the lab-leak question, the censorship. But being right was never enough. This week, the receipts finally arrived. Anthony Fauci sat before the Senate Homeland Security Committee and invoked his Fifth Amendment right 111 times, declining to answer a single question about the origins of the pandemic. Days earlier, Senator Rand Paul released more than 1,100 pages of Fauci's private diary. In it, Fauci took personal credit for persuading New York and California to close their schools — the same closures he spent years publicly insisting he had "nothing to do with." The private record and the public statements do not match. And under oath, with the chance to explain, he said nothing. This panel goes through what actually dropped: the Proximal Origin Slack messages, in which the scientists who publicly declared a lab origin implausible privately put the odds far higher; the NIH keyword filters used to erase public comments about the Wuhan Institute of Virology, ivermectin, and the vaccines; the record-destruction requests; the celebrity diary entries; and the taxpayer-funded campaign to win Fauci a million dollars in cash prizes. There is a growing faction that believes its only job is to tell you how bad things are — to confirm, week after week, that the people running your institutions lied to you. They're often right. And they make a fortune being right while changing nothing. You only win by winning. The vaccine mandate didn't die because people were angry about it. It died because a handful of organizations stopped complaining and fought back — in court, through the institutions we already have. When the Biden administration ordered every employer with 100+ employees to enforce the mandate, The Daily Wire sued, and the challenge reached the Supreme Court as NFIB v. OSHA. In January 2022, the Court struck the mandate down 6-3, and it died. The mandate rested on the claim that vaccination stopped transmission — now universally conceded to have been wrong — and the legal case was won before that concession existed. Michael Knowles (host of The Michael Knowles Show, author of Speechless: Controlling Words, Controlling Minds) was one of the earliest and most consistent voices on COVID censorship; the NIH filter documents are the institutional confirmation of the argument he was making in 2020. Josh Herr, former General Counsel of The Daily Wire, ran the legal strategy that beat the mandate at the Supreme Court and breaks down what a presidential pardon does and doesn't cover. Dr. Simone Gold — physician, attorney, founder of America's Frontline Doctors, and author of I Do Not Consent — organized the 2020 White Coat Summit and was deplatformed within a day. We cover the Fifth Amendment and the pardon, the coming contempt vote, and whether real accountability is still possible. 00:00:00 – Fauci Pleads the Fifth 111 Times 00:02:59 – Meet the Panel & the Mandate Lawsuit 00:06:14 – Fauci's Diary and Alleged Perjury 00:13:54 – How the Diary Surfaced & Fauci's Real Motives 00:19:46 – Fauci's AIDS-Era Playbook & Loving Humanity in the Abstract 00:24:38 – Presidential Pardons: A History of Abuse 00:32:31 – When Fauci Became a God & Science Without Philosophy 00:38:13 – Doctors, Transgender Medicine, and Lost Moral Foundations 00:58:13 – Science Is a Tool, Not the Truth 01:06:11 – Universities, Institutions, and Why We Need Them 01:19:50 – Rebuilding Trust: Family, Flags, and Agency 01:24:59 – Will Fauci Face Justice? COVID's Toll on Gen Z 01:44:24 – Suing Over the Vaccine Mandate & Vaccine Safety Debate 02:00:05 – Duty vs. Collectivism & Dr. Gold's New Book Subscribe to The Jeremy Boreing Show for new episodes every week. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Jeremy Boreing sits down with author and cultural critic Rod Dreher for a nearly two-hour conversation about his forthcoming book, Weimar America — and the argument that the same illiberal spirit Dreher once diagnosed on the left is now rising on the right. Dreher’s 2020 bestseller Live Not by Lies described wokeness as a form of soft totalitarianism, drawing on the testimony of Christians who had survived Soviet communism. Five years later, after a long stint living in Viktor Orban’s Hungary, he returned to America convinced that the warning signs of a pre-totalitarian society — what Hannah Arendt called social atomization, a collapse of faith in institutions, the embrace of transgression, and a growing indifference to truth — are now flashing across the American right as much as the left. At the center of the discussion is a generation: the Zoomers. Jeremy and Rod dig into the rise of white identity politics and Christian nationalism among young men, the pull of Nick Fuentes and the Groypers, and Dreher’s unsettling report from Washington that a large share of the young men now working on the right have drifted toward radical, “tear it all down” politics. His core claim is provocative — that the dissident right hasn’t rediscovered conservatism at all, but has imported Marxism’s founding impulse, that the inheritance itself is the enemy, and rebranded it for a right-wing audience. The conversation doesn’t flinch from the fracture inside the conservative coalition. Jeremy and Rod discuss Tucker Carlson’s turn, his platforming of Fuentes, and the end of Dreher’s friendship with him; Boreing’s blistering assessment of Candace Owens and her treatment of Charlie Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk; and their shared concern about JD Vance — a man Dreher says he still hopes will one day be president, but who he fears may be making what he calls the “von Papen mistake,” the fatal 1930s miscalculation that a radical movement’s energy can be harnessed and controlled. From there the two turn to faith and culture: the search for God among young men drawn to older, more liturgical Christianity; the pilgrimage to Chartres; the “vitalism” now competing with the gospel; and why Dreher believes a moralistic, therapeutic, feel-good evangelicalism is no match for the moment. They wrestle with classical liberalism as a “secular manifestation of Christianity,” whether the West can hold together without a living faith, and the lessons — and limits — of Orban’s project in Hungary. The back half moves to technology and the soul. Jeremy and Rod debate artificial intelligence as a kind of “dark re-enchantment,” the fear that digital culture is neurologically reshaping a generation’s ability to perceive God, and Boreing’s counter that AI’s harms may simply be the front-loaded costs of every great technology. They make the case that freedom is only possible when it’s bounded by virtue, and consider where policy — on pornography, social media, and the protection of minors — is the right tool for the job. It closes somewhere more personal: Dreher’s nostos, his journey home to Louisiana, the loss of his sister and father, the end of his marriage, Dante, and how he came to believe that the only real Ithaca is heaven. His advice to the young men who feel abandoned by their culture is direct — get offline, search for God, learn to suffer well, and refuse to give in, because “never again is now.” Chapters: 0:00 Rod Dreher and the warning of “Weimar America” 1:18 Wokeness, soft totalitarianism, and the arrival of the “woke right” 6:00 Liberalism as secular Christianity — and the danger of its collapse 12:22 Chartres, young men returning to tradition, and “vitalism” vs. the gospel 16:51 The feckless church: evangelicalism, COVID, and the beauty deficit 36:01 The death of print, AI pastors, and the seduction of the fake 42:06 Hannah Arendt, atomization, and losing a shared reality 43:44 The DC trip, the Groypers, and the Weimar timeline 1:02:29 The right’s civil war: Tucker Carlson and the 2028 stakes 1:09:17 JD Vance, Candace Owens, and the silence over Erika Kirk 1:15:34 Tucker’s demons, spiritual warfare, and “deep, deep danger” 1:23:09 Antisemitism, Israel, and the markers of a Weimar society 1:28:26 AI as dark re-enchantment and a generation that can’t perceive God 1:44:10 Freedom, virtue, and the case for policy on porn and social media 1:52:52 Dreher’s nostos: divorce, Dante, and “never again is now” Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Captain Barry "Butch" Wilmore has spent 464 days in space — 278 of them unexpected. When the Boeing Starliner he was flight-testing began losing thrusters on its approach to the International Space Station, a mission planned for roughly a week turned into a nine-and-a-half-month stay in orbit and a return to Earth aboard a SpaceX Dragon capsule. In this feature-length conversation, Jeremy Boreing sits down with the retired NASA astronaut and U.S. Navy test pilot to talk about fear, faith, family, and what it actually takes to keep your head when the machine you're strapped into starts to fail. Wilmore's story runs from the hollers of Mount Juliet, Tennessee — where a mischievous Baptist kid was shaped by his parents, his coaches, and a biblical foundation — to the deck of an aircraft carrier, where he logged 663 landings (226 of them at night) and flew the A-7 and the F/A-18 Hornet in combat during the first Gulf War. He walks Jeremy through what it's like to dodge a missile at night with almost no depth perception, how a naval aviator learns to master terror, and why he insists that fear is an opponent, never an ally. He is one of only two people in history to fly five different spacecraft — the Space Shuttle, Soyuz, the ISS, Starliner, and Dragon — and the road there included a nine-and-a-half-year wait after the Columbia tragedy set his astronaut class back years. The heart of the episode is the Starliner mission. As commander on the spacecraft's first crewed flight, Wilmore watched four of his eight aft-firing thrusters drop offline — then a fifth — losing a full degree of control for the first time in the history of human spaceflight. He describes canceling the software that would have shut the failing thrusters down, flying manually toward the station, and knowing before he ever docked that he and fellow astronaut Sunny Williams would not be coming home on that ship. What makes this more than a space story is Wilmore's refusal to call himself "stranded." Drawing on the Apostle Paul's contentment in shipwreck and prison, he explains how he stayed at peace living out of a sleeping bag in a Japanese laboratory module, eating food other astronauts had set aside as trash, with no fixed date to come home. Jeremy and Butch go deep on the sovereignty of God, the difference between freedom and law, John Adams' warning that the Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people, and why the gospel — not raw human agency — sits at the center of it all. They also take on the American space program itself: why politics now sits upstream of engineering, how bringing Russia into the International Space Station shaped its 51.6-degree orbit and limited its usefulness for reaching deeper into the solar system, and why Wilmore has become a fierce advocate for keeping manual control in every crewed spacecraft. Finally, the conversation turns to a generation. Jeremy and Butch talk about Gen Z, the formative years COVID took from young people, and the case for hope over despair — the conviction, as Jeremy puts it, that you can step forward in faith and watch the ground appear beneath your feet. Wilmore closes on his Tennessee roots, the governor's race a residency statute took off the table, and where he believes the Lord may lead him next. This is a conversation about courage and precision, marriage and fidelity, patriotism and providence — and about a country Wilmore still calls the land of opportunity. Captain Butch Wilmore's new memoir, Stuck in Space: An Astronaut's Hope Through the Unexpected, is available now. Subscribe for full episodes of The Jeremy Boreing Show. 00:00 464 Days in Space, 278 Unexpected 03:03 From Backwoods Tennessee to Orbit 04:09 The Mischievous Kid Who Needed God 07:30 The Coaches Who Molded a Man 09:48 The Patriotic Pull That Changed Everything 12:47 663 Carrier Landings, 226 at Night 18:22 Mastering Fear When Missiles Lock On 25:25 Dodging Missiles Over Iraq at Night 34:06 Fidelity, Marriage, and 280 Days Away 46:00 9,000 Applications, Columbia, and NASA Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Wednesday LIVE with Nick Freitas, Jared Monroe, and John Strand. What is a conservative? What defines the American right? In 2026 those questions no longer have an obvious answer — and the fight over it is tearing the Conservative Movement apart in real time. In this live panel, Jeremy Boreing sits down with three men who have each answered that question with their lives, to ask what conservatism is actually supposed to be — not what it's against, but what it's for. Because right now the movement is at war with itself over almost everything. The Tate brothers were arrested, and while most of the right saw justice being done, a loud corridor of the movement rushed to their defense. There's the JD Vance–Marco Rubio split, the fight over Iran, and — of all things — Christopher Nolan's new adaptation of The Odyssey, which the right fighting about savagely. Underneath every one of those fights is the same question: who gets to define this movement, and the country the movement claims it wants to conserve? In this episode: – What is a conservative? Propositional Americanism vs. the purity death spiral — and the real fight underneath the JD Vance / Marco Rubio foreign-policy noise. – "What is a man for?" The Tate arrest, the young men sold strength at no cost, and what the outrage machine and the Tate brand have in common. The Odyssey. How the oldest story in Western civilization became a casting-war loyalty test — and what that costs the movement that claims to defend it. GUESTS: Nick Freitas — former U.S. Army Special Forces weapons sergeant with two combat tours in Iraq, and a ten-year veteran of the Virginia House of Delegates who chose not to seek re-election. Jared Monroe — known for years as "Not Gay Jared" alongside Steven Crowder, now running his own independent media operation. John Strand — a former America's Frontline Doctors figure from Simone Gold's COVID-skeptic operation, author of Patriot Plea, and a Congressional candidate in Florida’s 19th district. This is a conversation about American conservatism, the MAGA coalition, Tucker Carlson, Nick Fuentes, and what American conservatism becomes if it forgets what it was ever trying to conserve. Three men, three very different roads, one question. 0:00 – Cold Open: Tate Brothers' Arrest, The Odyssey's Record Debut & Crisis on the Right 5:49 – Reacting to Nolan's The Odyssey: Conservative Story, "Woke" Casting? 11:22 – Ceding Cultural Ground: Why Conservatives Stopped Making Art 19:28 – Parenting Through Pop Culture: Turning Media Into Teaching Moments 26:48 – Nolan's Bold Choices & the "Want-to-Want-Tos" of Conservative Film 30:36 – Candace Owens, the Kirk Assassination Conspiracies & the Cult of "Receipts" 41:47 – COVID, the Groyper War & the Rise of Andrew Tate and Nick Fuentes 53:42 – The Founders, Human Nature & the Constitutional Order 59:24 – Escaping the Internet: Real Community & the "Severance" Effect 1:05:24 – Mass Immigration, Assimilation & the Great Replacement Debate 1:11:05 – Nice Jesus vs. Angry Jesus: Christian Tribalism Online 1:18:19 – Community, Comedy & Why Gen Z Is Returning to Movie Theaters 1:23:23 – Faith, Family & the Jewish Model of Legacy 1:28:32 – Great Man vs. Good Man: Redefining Masculine Legacy 1:37:49 – Jeremy's Razors, Voting & Defining Conservatism in 2026 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Is Britain still a free country? Jeremy Boreing sits down with Andrew Gold — journalist, former BBC documentary maker, and host of the Heretics podcast — for a wide-ranging conversation about what Gold sees as the unraveling of Britain, and why he believes Americans are watching a preview of their own future. Gold argues the UK is facing a "multi-pronged attack on liberalism": a government growing more draconian, the rapid Islamification of major cities like Birmingham, and the collapse of the free-speech culture Britain once shared with the United States. Jeremy and Andrew open with proposed legislation that would force YouTube and other platforms to prioritize state-adjacent outlets like the BBC and Channel 4 over independent media — a move Gold calls "anti-social media" and warns could push Britain closer to North Korea and Russia than to America. From there the two trace nearly every fault line in modern British life. Gold tells the story of being pushed off camera at the BBC — informed, he says, that a white man could no longer host the documentaries he'd spent years researching. They examine why so many in the West embrace what some call "suicidal empathy," and Gold makes the case that it isn't empathy at all but narcissism and status-seeking, drawing on Will Storr's "The Status Game." The conversation turns to the grooming gang scandal and the scale of abuse alleged in Rupert Lowe's report, the decades-long institutional cover-up, whistleblower Maggie Oliver, and how Tommy Robinson became, in Gold's telling, a national villain treated as "worse than Hitler" for raising the alarm. They contrast the 31-month sentence handed to Lucy Connolly over a since-deleted Facebook post with far lighter treatment of other offenders — the "two-tier justice" many Britons now believe defines the country — against the backdrop of the Southport attack and the killer Axel Rudakubana. Jeremy and Andrew then take on democracy itself: whether voters can actually stop mass immigration when the outcomes they vote for keep getting overridden, from Brexit to California's Proposition 8. Gold explains David Goodhart's "anywhere versus somewhere" framework — the rootless elite who can live anywhere versus the rooted citizens who bear the cost of rapid change — and why cousin marriage, tribal voting blocs, and the welfare state make assimilation so difficult. Jeremy makes a provocative argument of his own: that mass migration is, in a sense, worse than colonialism — importing the least successful systems in the world into the most successful, rather than the reverse. The two debate the "creedal nation," whether America's founding proposition still binds newcomers, and what it means that so many arrivals are never actually asked to embrace the culture, the creed, or the country. Finally, they turn to faith and the monarchy: King Charles recasting himself as a defender of many faiths rather than the Christian faith, the singular dignity of Queen Elizabeth II, and whether Britain has forgotten that it is a Christian country. Gold ends on a fragile note of hope — Reform UK, Nigel Farage, Rupert Lowe, and Kemi Badenoch — and whether a fractured right can unite before 2029. An unflinching conversation about immigration, Islam, free speech, nationalism, and the survival of Western civilization — and a warning, from someone living inside it, about where America may be headed. Andrew Gold hosts the Heretics podcast. Subscribe for more long-form conversations from The Jeremy Boreing Show, and tell us in the comments: is Britain a warning America will heed, or ignore? 0:00 Cold Open 0:52 What's Happening in Britain? 3:59 Free Speech: America vs Britain 5:46 A Nation of Strangers 8:28 The BBC Told Me a White Man Can't Host 11:51 It's Not Empathy — It's Narcissism 17:09 The Grooming Gang Scandal 22:12 Tommy Robinson: "Worse Than Hitler" 24:25 Lucy Connolly and Two-Tier Justice 27:10 When Democracy Stops Working 33:52 Anywhere People vs Somewhere People 45:24 Is There a Way Out? 52:45 Mass Migration vs Colonialism 1:07:00 Why Islam Is Different 1:23:24 The Monarchy, King Charles, and Hope for Britain Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This week, prosecutors in Provo, Utah began laying out the case against Tyler Robinson, the man accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk — forensic evidence, surveillance footage, a confession note, and sworn testimony from the lead investigator. As the preliminary hearing opened, Candace Owens dismissed the proceeding as a "show trial," telling her audience the "real trial" would come later and casting herself as a lone truth-teller fighting demons on Charlie's behalf. Jeremy Boreing breaks down why what Candace is doing is not just wrong but deliberately misleading–and evil. A preliminary hearing isn't a trial — it's a narrow legal procedure to determine whether a case is strong enough to proceed. Candace knows the difference. The question is why she's betting her audience doesn't. The show walks through months of specific claims Candace has made — that Tyler Robinson was never on campus, that Charlie's microphone exploded rather than a shot being fired, that Erika Kirk, Charlie's own security team, Israel, or the federal government were somehow complicit — and measures each one against what has actually been entered into evidence: surveillance footage placing Robinson on campus four times the day of the shooting, a medical examiner's report confirming a single gunshot wound from a bolt-action rifle, DNA evidence on the recovered weapon, and a confession note and text messages already part of the court record. Joining Jeremy for this conversation: Mark Meckler — co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots, President of Convention of States Action, and CEO of JTN Networks (parent company of Just the News, Human Events, and The Post Millennial). Meckler brings two decades of experience watching grassroots conservative movements built, captured, and weaponized. Gary Melton (Paramount Tactical) — a former U.S. Army Special Forces Weapons Sergeant and Sniper Team Leader with four combat deployments, who has spent nine months systematically fact-checking Candace Owens' specific claims against the assassination evidence, one by one. Will Chamberlain — a Georgetown Law-trained attorney, former publisher of Human Events, Senior Counsel at the Article III Project, and VP for External Affairs at the Edmund Burke Foundation, who explains the legal distinction between a preliminary hearing and a trial — and the real defamation exposure Candace now faces. The panel also addresses new research from the Network Contagion Research Institute suggesting a measurable link between Candace's public claims naming Erika Kirk as a suspect and subsequent spikes in death threats against her — and what it means when a media figure builds what researchers describe as a "permission structure" for targeted harassment. This is a conversation about what happens when institutional truth-finding — slow, procedural, occasionally unglamorous — collides with an information ecosystem that rewards speed, certainty, and grievance over verification. It's about the difference between naming demons and becoming one. And it's about what accountability, both legal and moral, actually looks like for the people left in the wake of a tragedy that some have chosen to monetize. 0:00 – Candace Owens and the Charlie Kirk Preliminary Hearing 14:17 – Debunking a Year of Conspiracy Theories 26:39 – Why the Courtroom Is Exposing the Internet's Lies 33:02 – Who Candace Owens Really Is 1:12:33 – Gnosticism, Cults, and the 30-06 Ballistics Debate 1:26:23 – How to Actually Fight Back Online 1:49:36 – Institutions, Isolationism, and the Future of the Right 1:55:53 – Jeremy Buys Back Jeremy's Razors 2:05:13 – Closing Thoughts: Agency and Building the Future Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Supreme Court just ruled in Trump v. Barbara that children born on U.S. soil to parents here illegally or temporarily are citizens at birth — upholding the standard set in 1898's Wong Kim Ark and striking down the 2025 executive order that tried to change it. The vote split the Court, Clarence Thomas filed a 91-page dissent, and Justice Alito warned the ruling could seriously affect the country's future. But the legal question the Court just settled is smaller than the philosophical one still tearing up the internet, the right, and the country underneath it: what actually makes someone American? This episode traces that question from the messy realities of the founding — a Naturalization Act that limited citizenship to "free white persons," a Catholic signer of the Declaration despite the founders' deep suspicion of Rome, a Jewish immigrant named Haym Salomon who personally financed Washington's army at Yorktown — through the waves of Irish, German, and Italian immigration that reshaped the country each time without breaking it. It examines the current backlash on the left, using Minnesota's Somali immigrant population and Dearborn, Michigan's Islamic majority as case studies in citizenship without assimilation. And it takes seriously the newer challenge from the right: the rise of "Heritage American" rhetoric, the viral "How American Are You?" ancestry chart, and dissident-right figures like Charles Cornish-Dale (Raw Egg Nationalist), C. Jay Engel, and others arguing that bloodline — not belief — is the true measure of belonging. The episode argues neither side has it right. A nation can't survive as a pure abstraction with no people actually living it out — but it also can't be reduced to bloodline, especially in a country where, as the episode notes, almost nobody has an actual unbroken, undiluted lineage to point to. Drawing on Lincoln's Gettysburg Address, G.K. Chesterton's observation that America is "the only nation in the world founded on a creed," and biblical models of covenant and assimilation — Ruth binding herself to Naomi's people, Paul's image of the wild branch grafted into a new root, Isaiah's terms for the foreigner who joins himself to the covenant — the episode makes the case that American identity has always been a covenant entered into, not a coupon handed out or a bloodline inherited. It also covers Justice Thomas's dissent in detail, including his argument that the 14th Amendment rightly secured citizenship for freedmen because they had genuine belonging, not just presence — and closes with a look at the Trump administration's historic denaturalization campaign, which aims to file more than 20 times the historical annual average of denaturalization cases this year alone. If you've watched the birthright citizenship debate, the Heritage American discourse, or the fight over what "America First" actually means and felt like both sides were missing something, this episode is the corrective. 00:00 Do You Have to Be White to Be American? 03:47 The Supreme Court Just Ruled on Citizenship 05:15 Every Nation Decides Who Counts as Its Own 07:31 America Was Never Built by One Kind of Person 10:37 The Jew Who Financed the Revolution 13:14 20 Million Immigrants, One Nation 16:07 Citizenship: A Covenant or a Coupon? 18:43 The Minnesota and Dearborn Warning Signs 24:23 The Right's Plan to Deport 120 Million 35:00 So What Is an American? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

America turns 250 this year, and the arguments about what this country actually is — and whether it's worth keeping — are coming from every direction at once. Jeremy opens with the Supreme Court's ruling on birthright citizenship and the Fourteenth Amendment, then traces it back to a deeper question: what did the founders actually risk when they signed the Declaration of Independence, and what does America owe them 250 years later? Jeremy is joined by a panel built for exactly this moment: Eric Metaxas — NYT bestselling author of Revolution: The Birth of the Greatest Nation in the History of the World — makes the case that the American founding was the only genuine revolution in an age of so-called revolutions, and walks through what the moral character of men like Washington and Adams actually cost them. John West — VP of the Discovery Institute and author of Endowed by Our Creator — defends the Declaration of Independence against attacks from both the 1619 Project left and the dissident right's rejection of America as a "creedal nation," and unpacks what "Laws of Nature and of Nature's God" meant to the founders. Rick Green — America's Constitution Coach and founder of Patriot Academy — brings the civic-action lane: why self-government requires virtue, why virtue requires biblical formation, and what ordinary Americans can actually do to keep the republic. The conversation covers American exceptionalism, the Constitution under attack, the Supreme Court's birthright citizenship ruling and immigration, the growing rejection of the American founding from both the radical left and corners of the dissident right — including the fight over the term "Judeo-Christian" and whether America is a creed or a bloodline — and closes on where real hope for the next 250 years comes from. If you care about the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, American exceptionalism, and the fight over what this country actually is, this is the conversation for July 4th, 2026. 0:00 Monologue: What the Birthright Citizenship Ruling Really Asks 5:39 Meet the Panel: Metaxas, West & Green on the Founding 8:25 Is the American Revolution the Only One That Worked? 10:37 Chesterton's Insight: America as a Creed 15:26 Are We a Bloodline, a Place, or an Idea? 18:48 Is "It's Not a Value Judgment" a Cop-Out? 30:50 Naming the "Emerging Right" 36:12 Culture, Self-Government & the Immigration Debate 43:57 UFC, Patriot Academy & Reaching Gen Z 50:10 God-Given Rights vs. Government-Granted Rights 55:54 Is "Christian Nation" a Loaded Term? 1:00:04 Defining Christian Nationalism and "Globohomo" 1:03:26 Jefferson's "Alter or Abolish" Explained 1:10:09 Survey Data: Reasons Not to Despair 1:16:34 The Hard Work Ahead — and the Danger of Utopian Despair 1:26:10 Defending the Founders Without Excusing Slavery 1:36:45 Why Particular Men and Places Still Matter 1:44:03 Real Heroes, Caesar Rodney & Washington's Troops 1:54:12 Closing: Go See the Declaration Before It Fades Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Why Tucker Carlson is wrong about Islam and Israel — a former Muslim breaks down the false narratives reshaping the dissident right. Danny Burmawi, CEO of the Ideological Defense Institute and author of 'Islam, Israel and the West,' explains the 14-century history of Islamic conquest, the dhimmi system, the red-green alliance, Mamdani, and why anti-Semitism and Islamophobia are not the same. If you want long-form conversations that take ideas seriously, subscribe — it's the best way to make sure you don't miss an episode. Jeremy Boreing sits down with Burmawi for a wide-ranging conversation on Islam vs. the West, Tucker Carlson's guests on Islam, the conversion that took him from devout Muslim to Christian, what really happens to apostates under Islamic law, and whether the Gulf states are truly more tolerant of Christians than Israel. 00:00 - Is Islam a Better Friend Than Israel? 01:31 - How Tucker's Guests Lie About Islam 02:56 - The 14 Centuries of Conquest 05:24 - The Blood Tax and the Stolen Churches 07:21 - Why a Cartoon Made Him Devout 11:28 - The Day He Read the Quran for Real 13:24 - What Happens When You Leave Islam 01:54:27 - Why It's 'Islamophobia,' Not Muslimophobia 01:58:08 - How the Left and Islam Became Allies 02:13:08 - Tucker, Qatar, and the Christian Lie Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Last week, a neo-Nazi publishing house called Antelope Hill set up a vendor booth at a Christian conference in Ogden, Utah — and sold out. The conference was called "The War for Normal." It was organized by pastor and media figure Joel Webbon's New Christendom Press and hosted at Refuge Church by pastors Brian Sauvé and Eric Conn. Among the materials displayed and sold: The Essential Speeches of Adolf Hitler, an SS commander memoir titled Burning Souls, books originally published by the SS Main Office, handouts recommending The Turner Diaries — the neo-Nazi novel that inspired the Oklahoma City bombing — alongside swastika jewelry and literature promoting Cosmotheism, a pagan Nazi religion that places the Aryan race at the top of the natural order. When the story broke, pastor Sauvé said on the record he had "no problem" with Antelope Hill's publications. That same evening, pastor Conn posted a video to his X account featuring a Sieg Heil, Hitler Youth imagery, the founder of the American Nazi Party, and an SS officer confirming Adolf Hitler was "one hundred percent" his hero. Joel Webbon posted that he would "never" criticize the conference organizers — and then, days later, posted about Jews: "They killed the Prophets. They killed the Lord Jesus. Paul calls them 'the enemies of all mankind.'" The same week, Tucker Carlson published a 100-minute interview with theologian JD Hall — with Webbon in the studio — titled "The Corrupting Lie of Christian Zionism." In the episode, Hall argued that Christian Zionism is a 19th-century invention rooted in John Nelson Darby's dispensationalism and propagated by the Scofield Reference Bible, which he describes as effectively a Zionist operation. Hall calls Israel "a desert war cult," claims modern Judaism is a post-Temple invention with no continuity with the religion of the Old Testament, and characterizes certain Jewish prayers as prayers for the destruction of Christians. But Hall didn't stop at reframing the Jewish relationship. He went further — reframing Islam as a friend to Christianity. Hall claimed that Muslims "love Jesus." He revised the documented history of the Ottoman Empire, characterizing Muslim rulers as having been "very kind to Christians." And he argued that the reason Christians and Muslims don't get along is because of — in his words — "Jewish talking points that you see on the television and the news." These two events — Ogden and Tucker's studio — are not separate stories. They are the visible surface of a years-long ideological shift: from Israel is our ally to Jews are our enemies — and now, Muslims are our friends. The theological arguments Hall makes have ancient roots. The problem is where the same men making those arguments also stand. Doug Wilson — one of the most prominent figures in Christian nationalism — asked the right question after Ogden: why did Antelope Hill think there was a healthy market for their books at a Christian conference? Tonight, we answer that question. Joining Jeremy for this live panel: JON HARRIS (@jonharris1989) — Host of Conversations That Matter and author of Against the Waves (2025), Christianity and Social Justice (2020), and Social Justice Goes to Church (2021). MDiv from Southeastern Seminary. Ordained pastor. Has spent a decade tracking ideological infiltration of evangelical and Reformed spaces — first from the progressive left, now from the ethnonationalist right. Tonight he traces the intellectual genealogy of this movement and names the institutional failures that allowed it to take root. WILL SPENCER (@willspencer) — Stanford-educated. Grew up Jewish. Baptized 2020. Member of Reformation Presbyterian Church in Mesa, Arizona. Host of The Will Spencer Podcast and author of the most important document on this subject: "The Dangerous Secret Your Young Men Are Keeping: Neo-Nazi Thought Has Entered the Church" (Christ Over All, June 2025). In early 2024, Spencer nearly got pulled into the Stone Choir orbit — and came back to write the definitive account of how the radicalization pipeline works on real Christian men in real time. ETHAN HANSON — Making his first-ever public appearance under his real name. For years, he has been the anonymous investigative X account @not_our_guy / Hitler Hated Christ. His posts were cited as primary sources by both the Christian Post and The Bulwark in their coverage of the Refuge Church / Antelope Hill scandal. He identified the SS officer in Conn's video. He documented the Antelope Hill booth materials. He captured the Antelope Hill representative on livestream: "We're just selling Third Reich literature at a Christian conference is all." Tonight, for the first time, he's here as himself. Also discussed: Stone Choir podcast and host Cory Mahler, who has publicly stated Adolf Hitler is in Paradise, called the Holocaust "literally incredible," and — in a televised interview — did not rule out the possible need for genocide. Stone Choir claims 50,000–100,000 listeners per episode. The Antioch Declaration (November 2024) — signed by Wilson, White, Boot, Durbin, and Sandlin — affirming the Holocaust and condemning antisemitism and blood-and-soil nationalism. SBC and OPC condemnations of ethnonationalism, June 2026. The URCNA Synod Calgary debate on kinism and antisemitism. The closing question: what does a pastor say from the pulpit on Sunday to immunize his young men against this pipeline? 00:00 Neo-Nazis at a Christian Conference 04:34 Meet the Guests 07:32 Defining Christian Nationalism 09:39 The Neo-Nazi Pipeline Into Christianity 15:27 How Online Movements Get Hijacked 17:33 Is America a Proposition Nation? 23:20 Why Jews Are the Target 38:31 What's Driving the Pipeline 40:34 COVID, Conspiracies & Anti-Semitism 51:10 The Theology Behind Jew-Hatred 57:27 America Is Not Weimar 01:09:06 Evangelicalism & Why Young Men Are Leaving 01:21:06 Re-Enchantment & What Young Men Want 01:27:22 Cultural vs. Biblical Christianity 01:35:19 The Gospel & Racial Identity 01:44:59 Church, Community & Real Solutions 01:50:52 Fatherlessness & the Crisis of Authority 02:04:10 The Real Christian Response Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Trump administration has now released three tranches of declassified UAP files — 294 documents in five weeks. The Pentagon website hosting the files has received over 1.7 billion hits. Among the files is military sensor footage of objects demonstrating capabilities no known aircraft can replicate. The President calls it evidence of extraterrestrial life. His Vice President has a different theory: he thinks UFOs are actually demons. Steven Spielberg, on the other hand, says his new film about government alien cover-ups isn't science fiction. Everybody has an answer. Almost nobody is asking the right question. The right question isn't what the phenomena are. It's why we see what we see — why every age in human history has looked at unexplained lights in the sky and found confirmation of whatever it already believed. Angels in the ancient world. Demons in the medieval world. Secret weapons in World War II. Extraterrestrials in the Space Age. The phenomena didn't change. The cultural lens did. Jeremy argues that both dominant explanations — the alien hypothesis and the demonic hypothesis — are wrong, and wrong in exactly the same way: both strip human beings of their agency, their genius, and their God-given centrality in the story. One calls the powers benevolent. The other calls them malevolent. But in both cases, we are not the authors of our own history. That's not a Christian position. It's not a conservative one. And it's not true. Jeremy gets into: — Why the extraterrestrial hypothesis collapses under the very science that seems to support it, and what the actual UAP files most likely show — How our cultural operating system — built by 80 years of science fiction cinema — shapes what we see before we've processed what we're looking at — Why Tucker Carlson's demonic interpretation of UAP phenomena isn't drawn from Scripture — and what the Bible actually says about how spiritual forces operate — The reverse-engineering lie at the heart of Disclosure Day, and why attributing human technological achievement to alien or demonic sources is an insult to every scientist, engineer, and builder in history — What chronological snobbery is, why every age thinks it finally has the right answers, and why ours is no different — The biblical mandate for human agency, stewardship, and dominion — and why "someone else is running the world" has always been the oldest escape from responsibility 0:03 — The Government Releases Its UFO Files 2:21 — Aliens or Demons? The Two Competing Interpretations 4:11 — A Brief History of Unexplained Sky Phenomena 6:10 — 1947 and the Birth of Modern UFO Culture 7:34 — The Cultural Operating System 9:11 — Scientific Naturalism and the Alien Imagination 12:07 — Reviewing Disclosure Day: Spielberg's New Film 27:56 — Both Views Are Fundamentally Anti-Human 28:50 — Demons Didn't Split the Atom 32:17 — Ancient Aliens and the Insult to Human Ingenuity 34:38 — Occam's Razor and the Limits of Speculation 36:30 — The Anthropocentric Framework 38:22 — Human Agency, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Gnostic Temptation 41:05 — Conclusion: The World Is Ours Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Lucas Gage is a Marine veteran who spent 14 years as one of the most prominent voices in what he calls the "JQ movement" — the “Jewish Question” — the online community built around antisemitism. He appeared on David Duke's program. He built a following of hundreds of thousands. He helped create the conspiracy-minded, anti-Israel wing of what is now called the dissident right. Now he’s walking away publicly at what he says is a high personal cost. In this conversation, Lucas and Jeremy trace how it started — 9/11, the WMD lie, Alex Jones, David Icke, and the pipeline from conspiracy theory to organized antisemitism. They talk about the specific moments that broke the spell: a crypto scam by a fellow traveler, a defamation by another, and Charlie Kirk assassination theories so unhinged they produced radicalization fatigue even in Lucas. We discuss audience capture, the economics of outrage, and how the same algorithms that empowered the dissident right are now actively making it more extreme and less coherent. They don't agree on everything. They argue about Gaza. They argue about Iraq. They push back where they disagree. But this is one of the most unusual conversations Jeremy has had on this show — and one of the most important. There are thousands of young men exactly like Lucas, disillusioned and looking for meaning and truth in all the wrong places. Lucas hopes that by publicly correcting himself, he can help other men do the same.  Lucas's message to his former audience: Fact-check the people you trust. It's okay to be wrong. Let it go. 0:00 Introduction 0:01 "Low IQ" vs. "High IQ" Anti-Semitism 2:51 The Three Things That Broke the Spell 6:19 What Is the JQ Movement? 7:18 The Charlie Kirk Assassination Theories 9:52 Origin Story: 9/11, WMDs, and the Conspiracy Pipeline 13:06 White Nationalism, Name Changes, and the Trump Train 16:19 "We've Seen This Before" — Is This Transformation Real? 50:14 The Table Analogy: Knowing Everything and Missing the Obvious 54:00 Trauma, Victimhood, and the Psychology of Radicalization 1:21:47 Was Iraq a Lie? 1:27:43 The Economics of Rage: How Money Ruined the Movement 1:48:31 Gaza: Where Jeremy and Lucas Disagree 2:00:36 Are Jews a Monolith? 2:21:22 What Lucas Wants to Be Remembered Fo Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

American greatness has enemies. Some are foreign — a nuclear deal struck in secret, terms the public hasn’t seen, a 60-day window before we find out whether the framework holds. Some are civilizational — a 219-page parliamentary inquiry confirming that at least 250,000 girls were systematically raped across the UK while institutions looked away, paralyzed by fear of being called racist. And some are internal — a fractured Right that can’t agree on what it’s trying to conserve, or whether it’s worth conserving at all. This week, we watched as thousands of foreign visitors attended the World Cup in America and were dazzled by our beautiful country. It was a wholesome reminder of what we’re fighting for, and what we lose if the enemies of the West win.  Tonight, Jeremy Boreing is joined by Katie Pavlich, Karol Markowicz, and Bethany Mandel to name the threats, connect the threads, and ask the question that runs underneath all of it: what does it actually take to protect and preserve what makes America worth defending? Jeremy gets into: The Iran MOU — what’s in it, what’s contradicted, what Israel wasn’t told, and why the Senate’s silence matters The UK rape gang inquiry: 219 pages, at least 149 local authority districts, and institutions that chose self-protection over the safety of children The thread connecting both stories — and why Jeremy names it directly What the World Cup is revealing: millions of Europeans discovering America for the first time and loving what they find The broader question: what does it take for the American Right to preserve and advance what’s worth preserving — in its current fractured state? Katie Pavlich hosts Katie Pavlich Tonight on NewsNation and is the author of the New York Times bestseller Fast and Furious. Karol Markowicz is a columnist for the New York Post and co-host of the Karol Markowicz Show. Bethany Mandel is a conservative columnist and homeschooling mother of six. Together, Karol and Bethany are the co-authors of Stolen Youth, a national bestseller published by The Daily Wire. 00:00 Introduction 00:51 UK Rape Gang Report: 250,000 Victims 04:50 Iran Deal: Snatching Defeat From Victory? 09:14 Iran, Drones, and America's Military Readiness 13:22 Can Israel Even Agree to This Deal? 17:37 JD Vance, 2028, and the Soul of MAGA 27:37 Charlie Kirk's Betrayal and the Big Tent Problem 35:11 What MAGA Actually Stands For 41:23 Tucker vs. Shapiro: The Real Disagreement Is America 47:17 The Woke Right, Catholicism, and Ends Justify the Means 57:22 Could UK Rape Gangs Happen in America? 1:02:59 Expert Culture, Therapy, and Anti-American Thinking 1:09:17 Birth Rates, Bad Ideas, and the Anti-Natalist Lie 1:23:13 Therapy Culture Is Anti-God and Anti-American 1:32:38 Europeans Discover Real America at the World Cup 1:38:08 Trad Larping, Gen Z, and Finding the Real Future Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The peer review system that governs scientific publishing was built to be an immune system — a self-correcting mechanism to keep bad science from becoming policy. It isn't working. In fields captured by ideology, particularly gender medicine, the correction mechanism has been reversed: papers that confirm the approved narrative sail through, while letters to the editor challenging them are ghosted, buried in endless limbo, or sent back to the same reviewers who approved the original paper. Dissent doesn't get published. It disappears. And in the absence of peer-reviewed counter-evidence, judges, policymakers, and medical boards treat the silence as consensus. Colin Wright has been fighting this for eight years. He left academic biology rather than write DEI statements affirming things he knew to be false. He was canceled at peak cancel culture for publishing — in Quillette and the Wall Street Journal — a simple biological claim: there are exactly two sexes. He watched papers that would have been laughed out of any rigorous review process get cited by the American Academy of Pediatrics, referenced in federal court cases, and used to justify irreversible medical procedures on minors. And rather than opt out of the system or fight it from the outside, he built something new inside it. Colin and Theory and Society editor-in-chief Kevin McCaffrey announced a first-of-its-kind post-publication peer review system through Springer Nature — a $1.8 billion academic institution. The system lets anyone submit a formal peer review of any published paper, routes it through an editorial process that evaluates argument quality rather than ideological alignment, and includes a built-in right of reply. If the original authors respond within a month, both pieces publish simultaneously. If they don't, the criticism publishes anyway. The veto that has been silencing dissent is gone. Jeremy gets into: - How peer review works when it works — and the specific ways ideological capture has broken it in gender medicine and related fields - The pipeline from flawed academic paper to AMA guidelines to federal court precedent — and why the absence of published counter-evidence is used as evidence of consensus - The multivariate animal sex paper, the brine shrimp wedding, and other examples of ideologically captured research that passed peer review and are now being cited in policy - How Theory and Society's post-publication peer review system works, what makes it structurally different from existing letter-to-the-editor processes, and why the right-of-reply guarantee changes everything - Colin's one policy recommendation: tie federal research funding to journals that don't require positionality statements or ideological terminology — and why that alone could restructure the incentive system - Colin's personal biography: flunking out of community college, losing his academic career at peak cancel culture, moving back in with his parents to become a fitness influencer — and the series of setbacks that led to the most consequential work of his career - Why the X comparison holds: just as one free speech platform changed the speech policies of every other platform, one journal willing to publish dissent may be enough to force the rest of the system to reform Also referenced: Christina Buttons, James Lindsay, Gordon Guyatt, James Nuzzo, Claire Lehman (Quillette), Kevin McCaffrey (Theory and Society). 00:00 Introduction 00:53 Is the Peer Review System Broken? 03:15 When Politics Corrupts Hard Science 05:30 How Peer Review Actually Works 09:08 How Ideological Capture Destroys Science 13:04 How Bad Science Becomes Real Policy 22:07 Colin Wright's New Post-Publication Peer Review System 30:26 Responding to Critics of the New Journal 41:37 The Scale of the Problem 48:38 The One Policy Change That Could Fix Everything 53:17 Did Peer Review Ever Actually Work? 55:54 The Craziest Papers Ever Published 59:56 How Colin Wright Got Here 1:08:41 Canceled at Peak Cancel Culture 1:16:11 Why Colin Refused to Compromise on Truth 1:22:29 The Betrayal of Academia 1:32:45 COVID, DEI, and the Full Corruption of Science 1:36:01 What Colin Wright Hopes His Legacy Will Be Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Congress just handed a conspiracy theory a credential it will never lose. On Monday, on the 59th anniversary of the USS Liberty attack, Thomas Massie — a lame-duck congressman with nothing left to lose — stood on the floor of the United States House of Representatives and entered an antisemitic conspiracy theory into the Congressional Record. The claim: that Israel deliberately murdered American sailors in 1967, and that the U.S. government covered it up. That claim has lived for decades in the fever swamps of fringe blogs and crackpot influencers. Now it lives in the Congressional Record forever. That same week: President Trump resumed strikes on Iran after an American Apache helicopter was downed, and already Alex Jones and others on the conspiratorial Right are suggesting its a false flag operation by Israel. And a jury in Collin County convicted Karmelo Anthony of murder — and the social feeds filled immediately leftists are demanding his release along racial lines, while Nick Fuentes is calling for whites to mirror that same racial solidarity. The left and the dissident right are not opposites. They are competing brands of the same product — despair, blame, and the conviction that the only way forward is to burn it down. The left packages it as systemic oppression. The dissident right packages it as stolen greatness. The destination is the same: a person who has surrendered his agency to whichever movement most convincingly tells him he was wronged. But Jeremy believes we can build a better future. Not as a naive refusal to see the problems — but as the conviction, grounded in faith, that your choices still matter, that building is still possible, and that the future belongs to those who build it. Tonight, Jeremy is joined by the team making that case from the inside. Jeremy gets into: --Why Massie's USS Liberty speech is more dangerous than its content — and what the venue tells you about where the dissident right is heading --The convergence of the left and the dissident right: same ideology, different packaging --Why Jeremy launched this show — not because he wanted a podcast, but because an object in motion is more generative than an object at rest --How Boreing Media thinks about AI, editorial standards, and building institutions that don't drift toward audience capture --What the conservative movement actually has to do in the next two years to avoid handing power back to the left Guests: Alyssa Cordova (Executive Producer, The Jeremy Boreing Show), Jon Lewis (President, Boreing Media), Joel Berry (Senior Producer, The Jeremy Boreing Show; former Managing Editor, The Babylon Bee) 00:00 Introduction – USS Liberty, Thomas Massey & the Dissident Right 02:16 Carmelo Anthony Verdict & the Left-Right Convergence 03:49 Jeremy's Story: Leaving The Daily Wire & Starting Over 06:41 Why Jeremy Launched This Show 08:01 The Conservative Movement in Crisis 09:15 Meet the Team: John Lewis, Joel Berry & Alyssa Cordova 17:03 What Makes the Daily Wire Different: A Culture of Winning 23:49 Mission Over Role: Rightly Ordering Your Priorities 28:29 Work as Worship: The Protestant Work Ethic & Calling 36:28 Parasocial Relationships – Good, Bad & the President Parallel 47:22 Every Job Has a Mission – Plumbers, Tombstone Sellers & Sandwich Makers 01:02:57 AI, Filmmaking & the Future of Media 01:09:46 Breaking Down the Team's Daily Reality 01:22:31 Audience Q&A: Where Does the Political Chaos End? 01:37:52 Audience Q&A: Husband, Wife & Competing Callings 02:02:57 Audience Q&A: Thoughts on AI Filmmaking 02:18:36 Audience Q&A: What Matters Most in Friendship 02:37:01 The Bent Key – Debunking a Fan Conspiracy Theory Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Today marks the fifty-ninth anniversary of the attack on the USS Liberty.  Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Thomas Massie and their ilk have been pushing a conspiracy theory about what happened on June 8th, 1967 — and they’re lying to you about what really happened.  This is Jeremy's definitive debunking of the USS Liberty conspiracy theory: what the evidence actually shows, why the false flag narrative doesn't survive scrutiny, and why the dissident Right is pushing lies about the tragic deaths of 34 American sailors. On June 8th, 1967, Israeli forces attacked the USS Liberty, a U.S. Navy intelligence ship operating in the eastern Mediterranean near the Sinai coast. Thirty-four Americans were killed. One hundred and seventy-one were wounded. Every official investigation that followed — the Navy Court of Inquiry, CIA analysis, the NSA's declassified intercepts, the Clark Clifford report, the Joint Chiefs review, and multiple congressional investigations — reached the same conclusion: the attack was a tragic case of mistaken identity. Friendly fire in the fog of war. That verdict has never been overturned. The USS Liberty conspiracy theory exists not because the evidence supports it, but because the evidence has been systematically misrepresented by people with an agenda. Jeremy gets into: the eight specific claims made by USS Liberty conspiracy theorists and why none of them hold up — the American flag argument, the NSA tapes, the "unmistakable ship" claim, the life raft machine-gunning allegation, the rescue plane recall, the Ward Boston affidavit, the 2003 Moorer Commission, and the cover-up theory; the Gish Gallop — the debate tactic of substituting volume of weak claims for the strength of any single argument, and how it drives every USS Liberty conspiracy conversation; the strategic context of June 1967 — Egypt, Syria, and Jordan massed on Israel's borders with the stated aim of annihilation, Soviet client states throughout the Arab world, and Lyndon Johnson's overriding fear of a great power confrontation with the USSR; how the USS Liberty came to be in the eastern Mediterranean and why it never received Navy orders to withdraw from the combat zone; Dr. Marvin Nowicki, the NSA's chief Hebrew linguist aboard an EC-121 spy plane recording Israeli communications in real time, and what the declassified NSA intercepts actually show; USS Liberty captain William McGonagle — Congressional Medal of Honor recipient — and his sworn contemporaneous testimony versus the survivor narratives that evolved over decades; Lloyd Painter's contradictory accounts and what the science of trauma memory tells us about eyewitness testimony from combat survivors; Admiral Thomas Moorer and the 2003 "Independent Commission of Inquiry" — no subpoena power, no access to classified material, funded by the USS Liberty Veterans Association, and why a private citizen's opinion is not the same as an official finding; the motive problem — why neither the "false flag to drag America into war" theory nor the "silence the NSA" theory survives contact with the actual strategic situation of June 1967; Iran's documented exploitation of the USS Liberty anniversary, including a coordinated campaign of over 2,000 Iranian accounts pushing antisemitic narratives at American audiences, documented by the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab; the Soviet-era origins of anti-Zionist propaganda and how those narratives migrated to Tucker Carlson's program, Candace Owens's platform, and Nick Fuentes; antisemitism as a conspiracy framework and why the USS Liberty has become one of the most respectable vehicles for it on the American right; and what Thomas Massie's planned House floor speech actually represents — and why a sitting congressman using American sailors' deaths to suggest Jewish power overrides American democracy is something the right needs to reckon with. Also referenced: Admiral Lawrence Geis, Admiral Kidd, Robert McNamara, Phil Turney, Dwight Porter, Russell David, Ward Boston, hull number GTR-5, Operation Cyanide, the State Department Foreign Relations historical volume, the USS Liberty Veterans Association, the Six-Day War, the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, Desert Storm friendly fire, the Battle of Antietam, the Battle of Germantown, Stonewall Jackson, and Pat Tillman. 0:00 The Attack on the USS Liberty 1:12 How a Tragedy Became a Weapon 2:27 What Is a Conspiracy Theory? 3:36 The Strategic Context of June 1967 6:40 How the Attack Actually Happened 8:42 Friendly Fire Is Not Rare 10:29 The 8 Claims — And Why They Fail 24:37 The Motive Problem 27:54 The Survivors Deserve the Truth 33:00 Where This Conspiracy Actually Came From 35:14 Why the Jewish People Are Always the Villain 41:26 What This Is Really About Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Southern Poverty Law Center calls it a myth. Most American institutions act as if it doesn't exist. But Noah Rothman's case is that the United States is in the middle of its third major wave of left-wing political violence in the last century — and the polling, the assassinations, and the institutional response all tell the story of a society losing the social taboo that has historically held this kind of violence in check. Jeremy is joined by Noah Rothman — Senior Writer at National Review, columnist, and author of three books, including the brand-new Blood and Progress: A Century of Left-Wing Violence, alongside The Rise of the New Puritans and Unjust: Social Justice and the Unmaking of America. Noah is one of the few Trump-skeptical voices on the right who has continued to keep his eyes locked on the threat from the left even as conservative media has, in some quarters, drifted toward its own conspiracies and grievances. They get into: the three historical waves of left-wing violence in America — the anarchist and socialist violence of the 1910s and 1920s, the Marxian guerrilla movements of the late 1960s, '70s, and '80s, and the wave we are inside of right now; why the SPLC and most academic databases of "political violence" double-count prison fights and homeless-person epithets to manufacture a top-line that the right is uniquely violent; the rhetorical tactic Noah calls "the pregnant 'but'" — how Bernie Sanders, AOC, Elizabeth Warren, and Chris Murphy all condemned Brian Thompson's murder and then immediately appended a "but" justifying it; the Charlie Kirk assassination and the institutional left's largely respectful response versus the campus and online cheering, the Saturday Night Live applause for the name Luigi Mangione, and the conspiracy ecosystem on the dissident right (Candace Owens, Ian Carroll, and the Epstein-pedophile-class framings) that now exists in symmetry with it; the Network Contagion Research Institute polls showing 50% of self-identified left-of-center Americans say it is at least somewhat justified to murder Elon Musk, and 56% say the same about Donald Trump; the three publicly known attempts on Trump's life and Norah O'Donnell asking the President on CBS to respond to his would-be killer's manifesto; January 6 and the BLM 2020 riots as comparative case studies in mob violence, the blanket pardons issued by both Joe Biden and Donald Trump, and why blanket pardons are never a good idea; Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn — the Weather Underground revolutionaries who killed people, never went to prison, and got tenure at major universities — and Alexander Berkman, Howard Zinn, and the Marxian intellectual lineage that fed them; Helen Andrews's "feminization of society" thesis and whether the rise of female representation in hegemonic left-wing institutions tracks with the rise in intolerance and willingness to censor; the strange evolution by which Marxists became Pan-Arab Baathists became Islamists, the Red-Green Alliance, and Jason Burke's The Revolutionists as the international companion text; the Sarah Milgrom and Yaron Lischinsky shooting in Washington and the textbook Marxian writings of Elias Rodriguez; the Soviet-era "Zionology" academic project that invented most of the anti-Israel narratives that now circulate on college campuses (white settler colonialism, brown-South genocide, rape as a weapon of war); two "cellphone moments" America is failing to reckon with — COVID accountability, foreclosed when Trump became the 2024 nominee, and the Charlie Kirk assassination, foreclosed by the dissident right's choice to build conspiracies instead of confronting left-wing violence; Tucker Carlson, the Catholic integralists, and the rise of "rhetorical statue-toppling" on the right; and Noah's recommendations on what actually works — civic education, law-enforcement modeling, and the patient, unglamorous restoration of the social taboo around political violence. 01:02 Is America Living Through a Wave of Left-Wing Violence?  02:13 The SPLC Calls It a Myth  06:17 The Three Waves: Anarchists, Marxian Guerrillas, and Now  08:27 The Psychology of Political Violence  10:27 Luigi, Brian Thompson, and the Permission Structure  13:06 How the Databases Erase Left-Wing Violence  43:45 What Ended the Last Two Waves  47:15 Why Wealth and Education Make Us More Vulnerable  01:14:40 How the Right Is Blowing Its Own Moment on Charlie Kirk  01:33:47 What Can Actually Be Done Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Two weeks ago, Thomas Massie lost his Kentucky primary. The night he conceded, Marjorie Taylor Greene posted that the Republican Party was "destroyed" and prayed for the “these creatures” — i.e. the boomers and her own party's voters — to be gone so the country could be "saved" by the young. A few weeks ago, Tucker Carlson called the boomers "the most loathsome, mediocre generation this country has ever produced."  Burn down the old so we can be saved by the young  is the most cynical lie in American politics today, and it's the same lie the left – Oprah Winfrey, Barack Obama, Margaret Mead, and Yuval Harari – has been selling for sixty years. This episode is Jeremy's case for why Gen Z is being sold a Marxist con dressed in right-wing sheep's clothing, and what it would actually look like to save civilization instead of burning it down. Jeremy gets into: the MTG "these creatures" post and what it really means; the $30 million primary Massie still lost; the blame-the-boomers movement and the numbers that disprove its central claims (Gen Z owns less than 10% of student debt, the homebuying gap is a 6-percentage-point spread not 66, millennial wealth tripled between 2019 and 2023); Tucker Carlson on the right and Jon Stewart on the left running the same Gen Z chase; the two kinds of historical progress — building on what came before versus the perpetual revolution that always ends in mass graves; why the American founders kept English common law and the French revolutionaries burned the calendar and sent 20,000 to the guillotine; Edmund Burke's "monster of monsters" and his partnership of the living, the dead, and the unborn; the Comanche as a case study in what happens to cultures that worship the young (they don't build civilizations); the sixty-year preaching tradition from Margaret Mead's Culture and Commitment through Oprah's "they just have to die" to Evan Sayet, Robert Fulghum, Eric Weinstein, and Yuval Harari telling kids not to rely on the adults; Abigail Schrier's Bad Therapy and the data on what telling Gen Z to ignore their parents has actually produced; the totalitarian playbook for breaking the parent-child bond, from Pavlik Morozov to the Hitler Youth to Mao's Cultural Revolution to Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge; the Fifth Commandment, Dennis Prager and the Apostle Paul on the only commandment that comes with a promise; what conservatism — per Roger Scruton and Russell Kirk — has actually conserved, including the world Gen Z woke up in; the boomers' real failures (no-fault divorce, abortion on demand, the COVID lockdowns) and the world-defining things they also built (Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Steve Wozniak, Tim Berners-Lee, the internet, the longest peace and prosperity in human history, Vietnam paid in 58,000 sons); the $84 trillion intergenerational wealth transfer coming over the next two decades; why the doom narrative about millennials was wrong and why the same story is being told about Gen Z now; and the closing call: don't be the doom generation, build the future, live long in the land. Also referenced: King George III, Robespierre, Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Vladimir Lenin, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, Winston Churchill, and Donald Trump. 0:00 The MTG, Tucker, and Massie Moment That Sparked This Episode  2:10 The Most Cynical Pitch in American Politics  5:24 Tucker on the Right, Jon Stewart on the Left  6:41 The Two Kinds of Progress: Building vs. Burning It Down  10:00 American Founders vs. French Revolutionaries 13:03 The Comanche and What Happens to Cultures That Worship the Young  15:26 Sixty Years of "Don't Listen to Your Elders" — Mead, Oprah, Obama, Harari  20:44 The Totalitarian Playbook: Pavlik Morozov, Hitler Youth, Mao, Pol Pot  22:27 The Only Commandment That Comes With a Promise  25:15 What Has Conservatism Actually Conserved? The World.  29:13 The Boomers' Real Failures — and What They Built Despite Them  35:10 The Millennials Proved the Doom Story Wrong. Gen Z Can Too. #GenZ #HonorYourFathers #BurnItDown #JeremyBoreing #JBS #TuckerCarlson #MarjorieTaylorGreene #BarackObama #OprahWinfrey #ThomasMassie #Conservatism #Marxism #PerpetualRevolution #FifthCommandment #SaveCivilization Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Evangelicals voted 82-17 for Trump in 2024, made up 27% of the electorate, and provided the decisive single-bloc margin in the national vote — for the third consecutive election. Without them, the Left wins. But American evangelicalism is under attack from every direction. The Left is trying to co-opt it — Hillary Clinton in The Atlantic, Andy Beshear laundering leftism through Bible Belt language, and Texas Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico telling Joe Rogan's audience that God supports abortion and is nonbinary. The dissident right's "Christ is King" movement is trying to fracture it from within. And decades of seeker-sensitive church culture have left millions of Christians biblically illiterate — easy targets for all of the above. Can traditional American evangelicalism survive? And can this essential voting bloc hold together? That's tonight's question. Joining Jeremy tonight: Allie Beth Stuckey — host of Relatable, New York Times bestselling author of Toxic Empathy, and the person Hillary Clinton spent six thousand words attacking by name. David Limbaugh — lawyer, nationally syndicated columnist, author of ten NYT bestsellers, five of which are on Christian apologetics, including Jesus on Trial. And Frank Turek — founder of CrossExamined.org, author of I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist — a man who came to evangelical Christianity from Catholicism through the power of evidence, and who's been carrying that evidence onto hostile college campuses for more than thirty years. 00:00 – James Talarico and the Weaponization of Christianity 10:30 – Should Christians Vote on Character or Policy? 18:47 – Trump, Evangelicals, and the Hypocrisy Charge 27:33 – Love vs. Approval: Has the Right Lost Its Witness? 44:11 – Catholics, Evangelicals, and Coalition Politics 1:04:42 – Why Young People Are Leaving Evangelicalism for Catholicism 1:17:05 – Sola Scriptura vs. the Magisterium 1:32:29 – Mormons, Muslims, and Who Can Be Saved 1:51:00 – The Demonic Battle After Charlie Kirk's Murder 2:21:10 – What Christians Owe This Moment: The Truth of the Gospel Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The defining illness of new media isn't bias. It's audience capture — and a generation of hosts on both the left and the right have stopped trying to lead an audience and started trying to be picked by one. Bridget Phetasy has watched it happen, written about it, and shed followers for refusing to play along. Jeremy is joined by Bridget Phetasy — comedian, writer, Spectator columnist, and host of Walk-Ins Welcome and Dumpster Fire. She's one of the few people in this space willing to tell her own audience when they're wrong–and admit to them when’s she’s wrong–and she joins Jeremy for a conversation that ranges from the news of the moment to the deepest questions of how a person stays honest in public life. They get into: audience capture as the defining illness of new media; Bridget's argument that Jon Stewart sitting with Zohran Mamdani and Tucker Carlson sitting with Nick Fuentes are doing the exact same thing — chasing the in-vogue youth demographic on the left with Hasan Piker-style socialism and on the right with Candace Owens and Thomas Massie-aligned nationalism; the late-night ratings machine that built our chase-the-youth instinct from Letterman, Leno, Conan, Fallon, and Kimmel onward; why Don Henley, the Eagles, and the Beatles all stopped making the zeitgeist when they aged out, and why that's how it's supposed to work; the early COVID skeptics Liz Wheeler, Steve Deace, and Jesse Kelly versus the political class (Donald Trump included) who Jeremy believes should have been disqualified from government over the response; the Hollywood-patron model versus the conservative-media model, with Megyn Kelly as the rare network actually developing talent and Matt Walsh as the case study in what network leverage can do for an already-driven host; the 12-step inventory, the regret piece, motherhood, and the resentment culture; Bridget's faith arc from Sam Harris and the new atheists through Emmet Fox and the Lord's Prayer; and what she wants her daughter to remember her for. Also referenced: Ben Shapiro, Joe Rogan, Konstantin Kisin, Dallas Sonnier, Andrew Klavan, Alana Newhouse, Allie Beth Stuckey, Ben Sasse, Joel Berry, James Lindsay, Michael Young, Jordan Peterson, Alex Jones, Taylor Lorenz, and Erika Kirk. 1:01 How Audience Capture Is Eating New Media 8:52 The Analytics Trap and Selling Out Your Soul 15:25 "More MAGA Than MAGA" and Algorithmic Dementia 23:14 Networks, Solo Acts, and the Matt Walsh Lesson 34:24 Hollywood, Patrons, and Why Conservative Media Won't Make the Next Roseanne 42:48 Tucker, Jon Stewart, and the Gen Z Trap 52:49 Don Henley and the Burden of Staying Zeitgeisty 59:27 Postmodernism, Nick Fuentes Going Mainstream, and the Plague That Wasn't 1:10:41 Why Hasn’t Anyone Been Punished for COVID? 1:19:17 Sometimes the Trolls Are Right — Regret, Motherhood, and Resentment 1:50:28 Faith, Sobriety, and What Bridget Wants to Be Remembered For Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Thomas Massie posted a poll on X in which over 85% of respondents said Israel is a greater threat to liberty in America than China, Russia, or Iran. Half the right is dismissing it as a bot artifact. The other half is treating it as gospel. Both are wrong — and tonight Jeremy unpacks why with three guests who study this exact machine for a living. Jeremy is joined by investigative journalist Lee Smith (The Plot Against the President, The China Matrix), political scientist Wilfred Reilly (Hate Crime Hoax), and investigative journalist, and founder of NPOV Ashley Rindsberg— three guys who, between them, have probably done more to dissect how false narratives actually get made, distributed, and believed in this country than anyone out there. They’ll get into the Massie poll and what representative samples actually show; the bot problem on X and what it means for public discourse and opinion; what Massie’s primary loss means for the next five elections; how and why a troubling number of people believe Candace Owens should be president; what a public that's stopped demanding evidence means for the future of the country; and more on tonight’s The Jeremy Boreing Show Wednesday LIVE. 00:00:02 – Thomas Massie's Loss & What It Reveals About Gen Z 00:02:33 – Foreign Propaganda & Why Americans Are Vulnerable 00:08:05 – Social Proof, Anonymous Influence & Manufactured Consent 00:16:56 – Russiagate, Domestic Propaganda & Broken Institutions 00:28:11 – The Manosphere, Loneliness & the Search for Meaning 00:38:20 – Gen Z, Religion & the Turn Away from American Christianity 00:48:39 – Anti-Semitism, Conspiracy Thinking & the Cult of Secret Knowledge 00:53:47 – Technology, Secularization & the Perfect Storm 01:00:17 – Building vs. Burning: How Do We Rebuild Institutions? 01:36:26 – The Death of Journalism & Conservative Media's Failures 01:47:45 – Final Question: One Thing You'd Change to Save the Country Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Last June, former Navy SEAL and podcast host Shawn Ryan tweeted, "I've fought in enough fake wars. I think I'll sit this one out." That phrase — "fake war" — is doing more damage to American veterans than anyone has been willing to say. It's Memorial Day. The 2,500 Americans who died in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the men and women who came home carrying what they did there, deserve better than a culture that has decided their cause was invented, their sacrifice was foolish, and their service was, at best, a mistake — and at worst, evil. Jeremy Boreing argues otherwise. Jeremy gets into: Shawn Ryan's "fake wars" tweet and the audience capture behind it; the Yale / University of Amsterdam study on how China launders its positions through TikTok influencers; the 2023 moment Osama bin Laden's "Letter to America" went viral on TikTok; the polling showing nearly 1-in-3 Gen Z voters now describe Osama bin Laden's views as a force for good; why Afghanistan was justice, not a war of choice; the lie of "forever war" and what 80 years of American troops in Germany, Japan, and Korea actually bought the West; how Winston Churchill, Franklin Roosevelt, and the soldiers who defeated Imperial Japan are being retroactively villainized by the same voices; the 9/11 conspiracy industry's strange second life; Saddam Hussein's torture chambers, the chemical attacks on the Kurds, and why every major Western intelligence service believed Iraq had weapons of mass destruction; President George W. Bush's 2007 surge and the Sunni Awakening that broke the back of the insurgency; President Barack Obama's 2011 withdrawal and the ISIS caliphate that rushed into the vacuum; the February 2016 South Carolina primary debate where Donald Trump dropped the phrase “forever wars” to take down Jeb Bush; President Joe Biden's $85 billion in American military hardware now in Taliban hands; Richard Nixon, the Christmas bombings, and how a Democratic Congress in 1975 gave away the Vietnam victory the military had already secured on the battlefield; how President Donald Trump destroyed ISIS, killed Qasem Soleimani, removed Nicolás Maduro from Venezuela, and authorized strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities; how Vladimir Putin can sustain a meat grinder in Ukraine while America's two-party system can't sustain political will past one election; the 2023 survey in which 73% of veterans said it was the withdrawal, not the war, that changed how they view their service; and the just war doctrine of Saint Augustine and Saint Thomas Aquinas — and how rewriting a war as "fake" manufactures moral injury that never had to exist. This is one of the most important monologues Jeremy Boreing has delivered. 00:00 The Origin of Memorial Day  02:19 "I've Fought in Enough Fake Wars" — The Shawn Ryan Tweet  04:28 China, TikTok, and Bin Laden's Manifesto Going Viral  06:04 Vietnam, Yellow Ribbons, and the Lesson We Forgot  07:49 Afghanistan Was Not a Mistake  12:31 The "Forever War" Lie and the 9/11 Conspiracy Industry  15:57 Iraq: Saddam, the Surge, and the Win That Was Squandered  22:29 Obama Threw It All Away — and ISIS Filled the Vacuum  28:58 How Trump Won the GOP by Attacking the Wars  34:14 Just War Doctrine and Manufactured Moral Injury  38:12 Thank You, Veterans: WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Global War on Terror  43:24 At 3 PM Today, Stop What You’re Doing Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The internet has handed the human race an old tool with a new edge: the power to form a mob in seconds, choose a scapegoat by lunchtime, and feel the sweet relief of expulsion before dinner. Jeremy sits down with one of the most consequential builders of modern Catholic media to ask what kind of spiritual force is actually moving through our feeds — and what it costs the people wielding it. Jeremy is joined by Father Steve Grunow, the executive director of Word on Fire — the apostolate he has built alongside Bishop Robert Barron over the last 25 years into the preeminent Catholic media institution in the world. A priest of nearly three decades, a former competitive bodybuilder, and a media operator who has spent his entire career at the intersection of evangelism and technology, Fr. Steve brings both the pulpit and the boardroom to a conversation about the spiritual stakes of the internet age. They get into: René Girard's scapegoating mechanism and why it has metastasized inside social media; the corrupting effect of influence on those who reach for it; the satanic logic of wielding dark forces like antisemitism for clicks; the 60-year civil war inside the Catholic Church and why it has weakened the Church's immune system; the uniquely American ecumenical alliance between Catholics, Jews, and evangelical Protestants and why it is now under threat; the grotesquerie of weaponized “Christ is King” content; the rise of Catholic LARPing and a new Pharisaism online; the cultural revolution of 2016 as a false-prophet moment, with Wokism on its tripod of racialism, queer identitarianism, and sex-war feminism; the wave of young men flooding back into the Catholic Church; the bodybuilder priest and what the gym taught him about evangelism; and finally the triumph of the Lamb. 00:00  Are We Living in an Antichrist Moment? 00:48  Is Media a Tool for Evangelism? 03:29  René Girard, Scapegoating, and the Online Mob 09:00  The Roman Roads, the Gospel, and the Devil Watching 16:59  Two Kingdoms, Two Banners 31:26  Influence, Ego, and the Corrosion of Power 39:39  Wielding Dark Spiritual Forces — Antisemitism for Clicks 43:41  The Catholic Civil War and America's Ecumenical Exception 53:45  Saved by “The Wrong Blood” 1:00:20  What Beauty Really Is — and Why It's Being Destroyed 1:17:07  Catholic LARPing and the “Christ Is King” Grotesquerie 1:38:19  The Revival, the False Prophet of 2016, and the Triumph of the Lamb Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The internet is convulsing with AI hysteria. Sam Altman is paying ten thousand dollars to have his brain chemically preserved — provided he's euthanized first. Bernie Sanders and AOC want to ban every new data center in America. And the "Godfather of AI" says there's a 20% chance the machines wipe out humanity in thirty years. Jeremy says: enough. AI is not the apocalypse. It is not the messiah. It is a mirror and a lever — and the only real question is who picks it up. Christians and conservatives have spent fifteen years retreating from every tool that mattered. Do that with AI and we don't preserve civilization. We abandon it. Jeremy gets into: Sam Altman's plan to be euthanized so a server can host his brain; the viral "23 atomic bombs" claim about Kevin O'Leary's 40,000-acre Utah data center — and the 6,500 bombs-a-day of solar radiation the same desert already absorbs; Bernie and AOC's AI Data Center Moratorium Act; the thirteen gunshots fired into Indianapolis councilman Ron Gibson's home after he voted for a rezoning; what AI is already doing in drug discovery, cancer detection, and farming; the real history of the Luddites — and Socrates, the railroad panic, and "railway madness"; Anthropic's Dario Amodei flirting with the idea that Claude is conscious; why Christian anthropology destroys the materialist AI worldview; the dominion mandate; Elon Musk's "superabundance" fantasy and the sweat-of-the-brow problem; the fixed-pie fallacy; Daily Wire's 18-month run as the #1 publisher on all of Facebook; the China AI race; and why this generation was handed this moment on purpose. Christ is King. He hasn't lost the plot. Now build. 00:00 — The AI panic machine is in overdrive 01:34 — Sanders, AOC, and the data center moratorium 02:09 — The Utah data center and the "23 atomic bombs" claim 04:06 — Fracking, fear, and the industry of panic 05:14 — What AI can actually do for us 06:31 — The Luddites and every panic that came before 10:11 — What AI actually is (and isn't) 14:15 — Jobs, displacement, and the fixed-pie fallacy 26:09 — Conservatives can't sit this one out 29:21 — Build the future or lose it Subscribe for new episodes of The Jeremy Boreing Show every week. #ArtificialIntelligence #SamAltman #DataCenters #Luddites #ChristIsKing #DominionMandate #OpenAI #Anthropic #ElonMusk #ChinaAI #DailyWire #BuildersNotLuddites Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

A lot of people are worried about what AI is going to do to us. The new technologies, as Jeremy puts it in this episode, invoke in all of us a kind of awe and wonder on the one hand, and a kind of fear of the future on the other. Both reactions deserve serious people taking them seriously. Jeremy is joined by Patrick Wood, founder of Citizens for Free Speech, who has been researching the Trilateral Commission since 1978 and co-wrote two volumes on it with the late Professor Anthony Sutton, and Courtenay Turner, his co-author on Final Betrayal and host of The Courtenay Turner Podcast. Together they make the case that an unaccountable technocratic class has captured the second Trump administration, that constitutional self-government is at risk, and that the AI buildout is the infrastructure for what comes next. Jeremy hears them out — Elon Musk, Curtis Yarvin, the dark enlightenment, JD Vance’s post-liberalism, the Genius Act and stablecoin tokenization, what Trump is doing in Gaza. But he also tells them where he disagrees: he pushes back on what he calls the "unified field theory" of the elite, he says he doesn’t fear the technology itself, and he makes the theological case for why there will never be a sentient AI. They get into: what "technocracy" actually meant when it was coined in 1937; the Brzezinski-to-Rockefeller intellectual through-line; Curtis Yarvin, Nick Land, and the dark enlightenment’s anti-democratic vision; the Highland Rim project and Christian-nationalist network states; the Genius Act and the road to stablecoin tokenization; the proposed natural asset companies and the $126 trillion blockchain announcement; Trump’s Board of Peace, World Liberty Financial, and the Gaza experiment; JD Vance, Peter Thiel, and the post-liberal Catholic-integralist orbit; the printing press and what disruptive technology actually does to a civilization; and the two forces Jeremy calls the most powerful on this plane of existence — God’s sovereignty and self-interest.   00:00 Has a Technocratic Elite Replaced Our Constitution? 01:35 What Technocracy Actually Is 08:11 The Strongest Case for Rule by Experts 15:34 The Dark Enlightenment, Nick Land, and Curtis Yarvin 29:33 Tokenization and the End of Ownership 45:01 Why I Don’t Buy the Unified Field Theory 57:58 Why There Will Never Be a Sentient AI 01:02:13 The Printing Press Argument 01:09:29 Trump, JD Vance, and the Post-Liberal Right 01:38:13 Hope for the Future 01:50:32 God’s Sovereignty and Self-Interest Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On Tuesday, Jeremy argued the populist right is selling a poison — that something was promised to you, that something was taken from you, that the only thing left to do is name the enemies who took it and destroy them. Tonight we’re taking that out of the philosophical and into the practical. We're six months from a midterm in a second-term presidency that the party in power usually loses by default. And the right has a problem that isn't new: we only know how to win by losing. We build careers out of being persecuted. We mistake martyrdom for strategy. We turn our defeats into the most glamorous parts of our politics. But you don't win that way. You only win by winning. And winning is unsexy. It looks like making the bed. It looks like persuading the voter who doesn't already agree with you. It looks like the slow, deeply unglamorous work of saving the country one choice at a time. I'm joined tonight by three sharp voices in conservative media: Graham Allen, host of Dear America and a former Pentagon digital comms lead; Jesse Arm, VP of External Affairs at the Manhattan Institute, who runs their polling shop and has been making the strategic case against the dissident right from inside the coalition; and our very own Joel Berry, senior producer at JBS, who spent seven years at the Babylon Bee and has been one of the most consistent Christian voices pushing back on the Tate / Fuentes wing of the dissident right. 00:00 Graham Allen Went Inside the Administration — Here's What He Found  01:43 How the Right Built a Business Model Around Losing  06:27 Tucker Is Still Running as a Loser — Even After We Won  08:56 The Babylon Bee Got Banned and It Was Great for Business  11:54 Why Democrats Keep Drifting Left of Their Own Voters  22:50 Gen Z Is Running on Vibes, Not Ideology  27:10 You Don't Have to Listen to Candace for Candace to Change Your Mind  33:01 Nick Fuentes Is a Cult Leader — And This Is Exactly How It Works  40:15 We've Arrested the Development of an Entire Generation  47:27 The Post-Religious Right Is Worse Than the Religious Right #TrumpChina #ThomasMassie #NYT #ConservativeMedia #Midterms2026 #GrahamAllen #JesseArm #JoelBerry Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Last week, Christina Buttons told me our culture is "deeply biased against agency." She's right. And once you see it, you can't unsee it. The left has spent two decades teaching young people that they are prisoners of systemic forces too large to fight. The populist right has spent the last few years teaching the same people that they are victims of a stolen inheritance, robbed by enemies who must be named and destroyed. The packaging is different. The product is the same — the relief of not being responsible, and the warm, addictive feeling of having someone to blame. It is poison — for individuals, and for republics. In this monologue Jeremy gets into what agency actually means, why Tucker Carlson's recent attack on Ben Shapiro is a perfect window into what the populist right is selling, and why the data on human flourishing — from the Harvard Study of Adult Development to Raj Chetty's mobility research to Viktor Frankl's observations from the concentration camps — all points the same direction: the belief that your choices matter is one of the strongest predictors of whether your life goes well. Jeremy also gets into René Girard's scapegoat mechanism, why the rising antisemitism on both the left and the right has the exact shape Girard predicted, why every revolution premised on perfecting man has produced mass graves, and why Jordan Peterson's most-mocked piece of advice — clean your room — is the operational definition of agency. And Jeremy tells us what we actually do about it. Marry the right person. Go to church. Serve your community. Work hard. Refuse, every single day, to accept the role of the victim. The country is you and three hundred million other people who are each doing the same calculation about whether their own life is worth taking responsibility for. If enough of us decide it is, the country gets fixed. #Agency #TuckerCarlson #BenShapiro #JordanPeterson #Conservatism 00:00 — Agency: the most unfashionable idea in politics 01:14 — The Harvard Study, Raj Chetty, and the Shapiro–Carlson fight 06:35 — Learned helplessness and Viktor Frankl 09:44 — The left's victimhood and the right's victimhood 12:23 — René Girard, scapegoats, and where the playbook always ends 20:38 — The most important thing Jordan Peterson ever said 23:32 — The victim identity is a transfer of power 27:23 — The 1950s myth and "bad policy isn't an excuse for a bad life" 30:00 — Adam, Eve, and the original denial of agency 31:33 — Six rules to rule the world Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

When Christina Buttons was 30, she was diagnosed with autism — and felt immediate relief. The diagnosis explained her teenage mental health crises, her social difficulties, her sense that something about her was just "off." She joined the online autism community, started advocating, and built an identity around it. Then she started reporting on it. And what she found made her question the diagnosis itself. In this conversation, Christina walks through the broadening of the DSM criteria, the "female autism phenotype," social camouflaging, and how a clinical disorder became a social identity that almost anyone can adopt. We get into the pipeline from autism to gender dysphoria, why both diagnoses share the same demographic, and what happens to the kids with profound autism when the label expands to cover everyone. Then we go to California — where Gavin Newsom has restructured Medi-Cal so federal mental health dollars now fund housing, groceries, drum circles, and "radical inclusivity." Where schools have become psychiatric clinics. Where a 12-year-old can receive a diagnosis and ongoing therapy without their parents ever being told. And where the line between mental health treatment and progressive activism has been deliberately erased. Christina's reporting at City Journal and the Manhattan Institute is some of the most important work being done on this beat. This is one of those conversations you’ll think about for weeks afterward. Chapters: 00:00 Christina Buttons on the Autism Social Contagion 01:19 Christina's Adult Diagnosis — and Why She Now Doubts It 11:02 The Real Harm of Overdiagnosis 19:50 Autism as Social Currency in LA 28:43 The Pipeline From Autism to Gender Dysphoria 31:07 Inside California's $15B Mental Health Scandal 41:00 How the Trans Agenda Hides in California Schools 50:19 Is the Internet a Trap? 1:01:53 Are We Becoming a Society Where Everyone Has a Disorder? 1:09:15 The Software-Hardware Trap of Modern Psychiatry 1:12:28 The Graceless Culture and the Loss of Agency 1:20:20 How Do You Want to Be Remembered? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Last night Candace Owens dropped a 236-claim response video aimed at Jeremy. Tonight, Jeremy and the panel–featuring Shabbos Kestenbaum, Ami Kozak, and Billy Hallowell–unpack exactly why she did it that way — and why no amount of "evidence" she manufactures will ever satisfy the audience she's built. The trick isn't proof. It's preponderance. And it's the same trick Tucker Carlson is running, the same trick the groypers are running, and the same trick that 2010-era chain emails about Walmart concentration camps were running before any of these people had a microphone. Jeremy is joined by Billy Hallowell, CBN host, author of Fault Lines, and director of the new documentary CBN Supernatural; Shabbos Kestenbaum, the Orthodox Jewish Harvard antisemitism plaintiff and a Gen Z voice tracking the woke right from inside it; and Ami Kozak, the Jewish creator and culture critic who's been naming the conduct, not just debating the points. They get into Candace's 236-allegation gish gallop and why it's designed to be unanswerable; the "wine mom" cohort smearing Erika Kirk and inventing massage-tear conspiracies; Tucker Carlson as a "confusion artist" deliberately disorienting his viewers; the woke right vs. the woke left and why Gen Z men are the target market; Obama's institutional capture and Trump's permission structure for being our worst selves; why Jeremy fired Candace and would burn the company down to do it again; the "authority transfer" that happens when audiences catch institutions lying; the Afghan soldier who thought the moon was the size of a golf ball; Marco Rubio's surprisingly optimistic White House moment; the federal officials who briefed pastors on extraterrestrial "disclosure"; Jeremy's own unspoken supernatural experience; and why conspiracy theories are comfort food in a chaotic world. 00:00 “Hey guys!” 02:56 Candace's 236-Claim Response Video  19:07 The Wine Moms Smearing Erika Kirk  26:06 Why Gen Z Will Surprise Everyone  39:35 Obama Broke the Institutions, Trump Broke the Manners  52:38 "I Fired Candace. I'd Do It Again."  1:12:24 Tucker Carlson, the Confusion Artist  1:30:42 The Federal Pastors Briefing on Aliens Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

When the Daily Wire laid off about fifty employees last week, Candace Owens told her millions of followers it was over fifty percent of the workforce. Then sixty. "Absolute bloodbath." None of it was true. But in 2026, lies are fast and the truth gets there last. Jeremy Boreing exposes a much bigger story behind the layoffs: we are now living inside an information environment that structurally rewards being first to a frame over being right about a fact, and that the personality-driven podcast economy has done nothing to fix the failures of legacy media. In many ways, it has made them worse. He walks through the Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect; the actual journalistic codes on the books since 1924 that we've simply stopped following; the Obama-era pivot from truth-telling to change-making in the newsroom; Billy Wilder's 1951 film Ace in the Hole that saw the whole thing coming; Russiagate, the lab-leak theory, and the Hunter Biden laptop as the prelude; the rise of what he calls the "grift industrial complex" — where cynicism stops being a tool and becomes the thing you serve; Candace Owens's audacious public claim that the George Farmer arrested in Nashville is not her husband George Farmer; Tucker Carlson's Dominion lawsuit, his on-the-record willingness to lie when a lie helps him win, and his recent New York Times interview where he accused unnamed neoconservatives of "treachery" and admitted, on the record, that he couldn’t confirm what he was talking about; Gresham's Law of bad journalism driving out good; and Alcuin of York's eighth-century warning that the voice of the crowd is always close to madness. Not a defense of legacy media. Not a brief against new media. An argument that the answer to the failures of the institutions is to build better institutions — not to abandon the model of journalism altogether for crowd-sourced certainty — and that all of us, audiences and creators alike, have to be willing to question ourselves before we question the headline. 00:00 The Truth Behind the Daily Wire Layoffs  04:23 Gell-Mann Amnesia (and the Lies You’ve Heard About Me) 07:06 When Journalism Had Real Standards 13:02 Billy Wilder Saw This Coming in 1951 15:36 The Grift Industrial Complex 20:33 George Farmer's Arrest 22:19 Tucker Carlson's Casual Lies 25:35 Gresham's Law and the Path Forward Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Anti-Zionism on the left and the right in America today is a kind of envy — envy of a country that still has permission to define itself, defend itself, and have a future. That's the opening claim Alana Newhouse makes to Jeremy Boreing in this two-hour conversation about Zionism, American identity, and the cultural project of believing in tomorrow. Jeremy sits down with Alana Newhouse — founder and editor-in-chief of Tablet Magazine, author of the breakout essays "Everything Is Broken," "Brokenness," and "Zionism for Everyone" — for a wide-ranging conversation that uses Israel as a lens for diagnosing what's wrong with America. They get into culture as a "mixing board" (race is loud in Japan, irrelevant in Israel — every culture calibrates differently); America's twin tethers of capitalism and covenant; the four questions Alana says every country has to be able to answer (are your people happy? do they have babies? can they defend themselves? are they future-oriented?); Tucker Carlson's truth-and-lie about Israel and the black pill industrial complex aimed at demoralizing Americans; the Artemis splashdown, the F-15 weapons officer rescue in Iran, and "what are the machines for?"; Alana's four-bucket framework for any institution (conserve, reform, destroy, build new); why she's drawn to leaders like Modi and Milei but skeptical of Orban and "Make America Great Again"; the original meaning of ethnos (it's not bloodline, it's the music a people make together); why anti-Semitism is a symptom and not a cause; and the fertility hiccup, the Gen X reckoning, and the case that creation itself is an act of optimism. Not a defense of Israeli policy. Not a brief against the contemporary right. A clinical, hopeful argument that the formula that built Israel — particularism plus pragmatism plus idealism — is exportable, and that the future belongs to whoever shows up to build it. 00:00 Anti-Zionism Is Just Envy 05:14 America's Twin Tethers — Capitalism and Covenant 12:22 The "Mixing Board" — Why Cultures Have to Be Different 25:17 The Zionism Formula and the 4 Questions Every Country Must Answer 31:59 What Tucker Carlson Got Wrong About Israel 36:30 The Black Pill Trap and the Lost Faith in the Moon Landing 45:00 Why Alana Built Tablet — Creation as an Act of Optimism 56:35 The Right's Failure on Social Media (and Why AI Is Next) 1:03:22 The 4 Buckets: Conserve, Reform, Destroy, Build New 1:21:39 When Ethnos Goes Wrong — and Why the Nation-State Still Wins 1:28:11 Modi, Milei, Orban — Looking for Joy in World Leaders 1:34:05 The Artemis Diver and the F-15 Rescue: "What Are the Machines For?" 1:46:09 Anti-Semitism Is a Symptom, Not a Cause 1:49:02 Fertility, Gen X, and the Hiccup We Have to Correct Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Politics is entertainment now. So is the news. The Right finally figured out how to use that — and so did the grifters who came in right behind them. Jeremy is joined LIVE by Shawn Farash, Siaka Massaquoi, and Jon Lewis to discuss what the convergence of news, politics, and entertainment makes possible, what it costs, and how to tell the difference between the people doing the work and the ones cashing in. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Saturday night's third assassination attempt on Donald Trump produced a thirty-second video of Erika Kirk weeping and asking to go home — and split the country in two. Half saw a young widow retraumatized seven months after Charlie Kirk's public assassination. The other half decided she was performing. Same pixels. Two opposite perceptions. Like 2015's viral "Dress”—except what's implicated isn't visual perception. It's moral perception. Jeremy Boreing makes the case that the cruelty being directed at Erika Kirk is not "trolling." It is the natural, predictable output of a fifty-year cultural project that elevated, organized, monetized, and amplified toxic femininity — the negative feminine of gossip, exclusion, and reputational destruction — while systematically dismantling positive masculinity and every institution that previously held those instincts in check. The result is an emergent matriarchy that Candace Owens once called "hellish" — but Candace is now its main promulgator, running the most flagrant toxic-feminine pile-on in modern conservative media: a gnostic conspiracy ritual dressed up as a true crime docuseries called Bride of Charlie. Jeremy walks the data: women's self-reported happiness in continuous decline since the 1970s; the lowest U.S. fertility rate in recorded history; 70% of divorces initiated by wives, almost none for cause of abuse; female-majority institutions — K–12 education, HR, higher education — becoming dramatically less tolerant of dissent; the FIRE study showing male students are more tolerant of their political enemies than female students are of their own allies. He works through the literary archetypes — Medea, Jezebel, Lady Macbeth, Dolores Umbridge — and the academic research on relational aggression that confirms what those stories already knew. He names the men who've built the manosphere economy on the rubble (Andrew Tate, Dan Bilzerian) and explains why neither feminism's emergent matriarchy nor the trad movement's larped patriarchy is the answer. Not a call to disenfranchise women. Not a defense of toxic masculinity. An argument that the answer to a bad cultural project is the slow, voluntary recovery of complementary masculine and feminine virtues — and that wicked men can only ever be constrained by good men.   Chapters 00:00 The Video That Divided the Country 02:40 This Is the World Feminism Has Wrought 06:48 Medea, Jezebel, and the 6th Grade Slut Code  10:27 Fifty Years of Declining Female Happiness 13:07 70% of Divorces and the Christian View of Marriage 17:33 Dolores Umbridge in Power 20:18 No, Erika Did Not Kill Her Husband 24:19 Candace Owens and "Bride of Charlie" 29:22 You're Being a B*tch 32:54 Wicked Men, Good Men, and the Trad Movement LARP 36:03 A New Technology 38:15 Leave the Grieving Widow Alone #ErikaKirk  #JeremyBoreing  #JBS #CandaceOwens  #ToxicFemininity  #ToxicMasculinity  #Matriarchy  #Patriarchy  #Feminism #CharlieKirk  #BrideOfCharlie  #TPUSA  #Manosphere  #ChristianMarriage  #ConservativeMedia Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Jeremy sits down with Lauren Southern — the woman who went viral on feminism and immigration as an impressionable 19-year-old, got permanently pigeonholed as alt-right, lived the trad wife life she'd been preaching, watched her marriage fall apart on the internet, and is now trying to figure out what Christianity looks like when public Christianity is almost entirely performance. Jordan Peterson twice told Jeremy he should hire her, but that never happened before Jeremy departed the company. This is their first conversation. They get into the “redemption arc industrial complex” and the cinematic Culture War universe. Whether anyone can actually be a Christian online. Why Jeremy thinks uploading your soul to the cloud is a category error, and what a night at a bar at 3 a.m. really tells you about a person (and what it does not). The two right-wing media spheres — Prager and Peterson as the example on one side, Shaffer and Tate and Milo on the other — and the symbiosis between them. Why Lauren found Destiny more honest than the “trad” friends cheating on their wives while posting Christ Is King. How conservatism became so graceless there's no path back for anyone who fails the trad life. Chinese spies, Russian honeypots, and the economy of paid tweets nobody sees. And why Boromir is the best character in Lord of the Rings. 00:00 The Redemption Arc Industrial Complex 04:45 Two Small-Town Evangelical Kids Grow Up and Leave 13:50 How Audience Capture Got Lauren at 19 20:45 Can You Actually Be a Christian Online? 22:30 Uploaded to the Cloud — Why Souls Are Embodied 36:50 Two Right-Wing Medias (And Why Peterson Wanted Jeremy to Hire Lauren) 46:00 Why Destiny Was More Honest Than Her “Trad” Friends 51:20 Graceless Conservatism: No Path Back After Failing the Trad Life 54:55 Dante’s Inferno Is the Final Level of the Internet 01:05:30 The Trad Life Has Never Existed (Except for Seven Women in History) 01:23:00 Chinese Spies, Russian Honeypots, and Paid Tweets 01:43:20 Why Boromir Is the Best Character in Lord of the Rings #Christianity #Redemption #JordanPeterson #Destiny #TradWife#Manosphere #ConservativeMedia #Influencers #CultureWar #AltRight#DailyWire #LordOfTheRings Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Jeremy is joined by three men who've each built their work around a different answer to the same question: what does masculinity actually look like when it isn't being sold to you by manosphere grifters? John Lovell (Warrior Poets Society) brings a decade of teaching men to be fully warrior and fully poet. Gates Garcia (We The People) brings the view from college campuses and the millennial mirror. Pavel (Be a Man With Me) brings the voice of an immigrant who noticed something was missing from American masculinity— and occasionally carries a machete. They get into the manosphere and why Pavel calls it “porn for masculinity.”; toxic masculinity, toxic femininity, and the generation of Gen Z men caught between them; why men need male friends (and why your wife can't be one of them); the 15-degree phenomenon; Pavel's machete at the gas station; the institutional collapse that makes Gen Z the hardest generation in American history to date in; and the practical advice none of these guys are monetizing: ask a woman on a date, show up early to work, get off social media, and find out what “Till We Have Faces” actually means. 00:00 Introducing Pavel, Gates, and John — Three Actual Men 04:43 Warrior AND Poet: 100% Both, Not 50/50 10:08 How We Got Here — 9/11, MeToo, the iPhone, and Covid 14:00 Lion of Judah vs. “Gay Jesus” — How the Church Went Soft 20:23 Toxic Masculinity, Male Suicide, and the Silent Heroes 24:00 Why a Man Needs Male Friends (The Waitress Problem) 34:15 Sports, Wrestling, and the Missing Rites of Passage 42:00 Toxic Femininity Is the Bigger Problem — And the Paradox That Fixes It 48:40 Pavel, the Machete, and the Gas Station Story 01:04:30 Why Gen Z Actually Has It Worse Than Any Generation Before 01:12:26 The 15-Degree Phenomenon: Why Women Need to Look Up 01:18:30 Practical Advice: Ask Her Out, Show Up Early, Get Off Social Media Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

A lot of people believe they independently "woke up" to the truth about Israel, the Jews, and who really runs the world over the last two years. Jeremy Boreing makes the case that they didn't — they were sold a worldview using the same rhetorical machinery that's fueled every social contagion from eugenics to the population bomb to Covid-era hysteria. Using dozens of examples, Jeremy breaks down the specific techniques deployed by Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and the wider black-pilled online right: pre-suasion, presupposition, assertion stacking, asymmetric skepticism, authority transfer, and the manufactured feeling of "waking up" that hijacks real skepticism and turns it into religious conviction. Not a defense of Israeli policy. Not a claim that conspiracies don't exist. A clinical look at how conviction is engineered — and how to notice when it's being engineered on you. 00:00 You’re Not Immune 00:47 Loose Change, 9/11, and the Illusion of Insight 03:06 Pre-suasion: Telling You What You See 04:42 Tucker Carlson on Pearl Harbor 09:30 "Obviously," "Clearly," "Of Course" 13:08 The First Deception in the Garden 14:43 Candace Owens: "We Don't Know Know, But We Know" 18:41 Eugenics, Overpopulation, Climate Panic 22:29 The Contagions of the 2020s 23:40 The Current Anti-Israel / Antisemitism Wave 29:05 Authority Transfer and the Moon Landing 32:33 Healthy Skepticism vs. Reflexive Cynicism #tuckercarlson #candaceowens #jeremyboreing #jameslindsay #propaganda #mediamanipulation #SocialContagion #Antisemitism #israel #ConservativeCivilWar #criticalthinking #psyop #moonlanding #america Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

James Lindsay — author, mathematician, and the man who coined the term "woke right" — joins Jeremy Boreing for a wide-ranging conversation on what's really happening inside the conservative movement. Is the cultural "immune system" of the right holding? Or has a subversive faction — what Lindsay calls the woke right — successfully dressed up leftist methodology in trad clothing and insinuated itself into MAGA? Jeremy and James dig into the methodology, the ontology, and the history: from Marx and Rousseau to Alfred Rosenberg's "Myth of the 20th Century," from Catholic integralism to Carl Schmitt's unbound executive, from the paradox of tolerance to the principle of reciprocal tolerance. Jeremy presses Lindsay on the question dividing the right: is he rooting out subversives, or is he burning down coalitions the movement can't afford to lose? They spar over Matt Walsh, Chris Rufo, Tucker Carlson, and JD Vance — and where the line sits between exposing bad actors and alienating potential allies. They also get into James's positive vision: a high-trust society, Federalist 51, divided powers, stewardship of power rather than the wielding of it, and why loving America — warts and all — is the only foundation a real coalition can be built on. And in a rare personal turn, James opens up about faith, agnosticism, the Book of James, and why he doesn't particularly want to be remembered. A vital conversation for anyone trying to understand the realignment happening on the right in 2026. 00:00 Intro: Has the conservative movement been co-opted? 03:05 What is the "Woke Right"? 11:15 Looking Backward: Marx, the Fascists & the Return to Eden 25:05 Lindsay's Vision: Federalist 51 and the High-Trust Society 42:00 Power, Stewardship, and the Limits of Government 57:00 An Age of Miracles: The Case for American Optimism 01:10:45 The Online War: Matt Walsh, Chris Rufo & Coalition Politics 01:34:19 Tucker, JD Vance, and Building a Positive America 01:41:40 Faith, Legacy, and the Book of James Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

JD Vance flies to Islamabad for the highest-level US-Iran talks in nearly fifty years. Trump blocks the Strait of Hormuz. And Joel Berry says the war is probably nowhere near over. Jeremy, Joel, Jon Lewis, and Ryan Chase also debate whether freedom can actually be exported, why Christians who disengage from politics have bad theology, the time Jeremy told a room full of progressive Christian do-gooders he was using government money to kill the gays, and why Project Hail Mary is a rebuke of everything Christian filmmakers are doing wrong. 00:00 Intro: Artemis Splashdown, Iran Ceasefire & Project Hail Mary  01:43 Is the Iran War Actually Over?  03:29 Trump's Strategy: Blocking the Strait of Hormuz  05:45 American Reassertion: Cuba, Venezuela & China  07:19 The Man in the Arena (The House Buying Analogy)  10:51 Congress Is Vestigial: The Problem with Governing by Executive Order  12:54 Trump's Legacy: Mopping Up Reagan's Evil Empire  14:13 Can You Actually Export Freedom?  17:41 Joel's Iraq War Story: Watching Saddam's Execution  20:05 Freedom Requires Institutions Built Over Generations  22:24 The Pilgrims Were Proto-Communists  27:33 Does the Constitution Shape People, or Do People Shape the Constitution?  29:04 The "Moral Decay" Psyop  33:23 Catholic Integralism and Left-Wing Economics  39:50 AI and the Next Attempt at Communism  41:14 "We Are the Joke": Humans Trying to Build Utopia  42:30 Jeremy's Restoration Theology Story  52:47 Eschatology: When End Times Theology Makes Christians Quit Politics  57:13 The Miracle of the Modern State of Israel  1:13:04 Does Jeremy Support Israel for Eschatological Reasons?  1:19:32 Project Hail Mary: A Rebuke of Christian Filmmaking  1:29:47 Q&A: Who Would You Have Dinner With? Who Would You Punch? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Tucker Carlson calls on American soldiers to refuse orders from their Commander in Chief. Candace Owens demands the 25th Amendment: "He's a genocidal lunatic." And Marjorie Taylor Greene says everyone in the administration needs to "fall on their knees and beg forgiveness from God." Here’s what Trump actually said, why it worked, and what the outrage reveals about the people manufacturing it. 00:00 Trump's "Whole Civilization" Quote and the Overreaction 01:31 What Trump Actually Meant 04:42 Reagan, Truman, and the History of Strong Language 07:39 Iran Blinks: The Ceasefire and What It Proves 08:24 Tucker and Candace's Real Motive 09:41 Christians and the Duty of Self-Government 11:44 Trump's Rhetoric: The Good and the Bad 14:53 Why Polite Language Can Be Evil 20:04 The Moral Weight of the Presidency 22:59 How to Think About Trump's Rhetoric Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The number of new Catholic converts just hit a 20-year high, driven largely by young men searching for a faith with roots, authority, and tradition. But alongside this Catholic revival, something else is growing — something that calls itself Catholic but may not be: Catholic Integralism. Its proponents argue that the state must submit to the Church, that only baptized Catholics deserve full citizenship, and that the American founding — the Declaration, the Constitution, the separation of church and state — is heresy. James M Patterson is an associate professor of public affairs in the Institute of American Civics at the University of Tennessee's Baker School of Public Policy and Public Affairs. He's also a contributing editor at Law and Liberty. He's President of the Ciceronian Society, and he's an affiliated scholar for the Center for Religion, Culture and Democracy. He's written two books, Religion in the Public Square and the upcoming book Why Post Liberalism Failed. And they're not just in the academy. They're in the White House. It's Episode 8 of The Jeremy Boreing Show. 00:00 Catholic Membership Is Surging — and So Is Integralism  01:16 Is There a Catholic Plot to Overthrow the American Founding?  02:05 What Is Catholic Integralism?  06:29 Why We're Talking About This Now  08:19 How Big Is the Movement?  09:42 What Is Post-Liberalism — and Why Is It a Rebrand?  17:49 Is JD Vance an Integralist?  23:26 How Concerned Should Non-Catholics Be?  25:19 The Historical Links Between Integralism and Fascism  32:01 Why Integralists Want to Divide Catholics, Protestants, and Jews  33:17 Can You Be "America First" and an Integralist?  45:52 The "Empire of Guadalupe" and Elite Capture  50:15 What Ordinary Catholics Need to Know  54:39 The Vatican Has Already Rejected This Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Jeremy Boreing is joined by biologist Colin Wright, Jacob of The Moderate Case, and Josh Carr for a Wednesday Live conversation that starts with a deceptively simple question — why are we addicted to despair when there's never been more reason for optimism? From there they cover the toxic economics of online outrage, the double-edged sword of anonymity, Trump's refusal to be a moral leader and what that vacuum has cost the right, the collapse of conservative institutions, and why victimhood on both left and right is best understood as a social contagion. In the back half, Jeremy turns the table on his younger guests with a frank warning about the slow, incremental compromises that turn principled voices into something unrecognizable. 0:00 - Intro: A Christian, an Atheist, and a Member of the LDS Walk In  1:19 - Why Are We Addicted to Despair?  8:19 - Online Anonymity: Protection or Poison?  18:17 - Trump's Moral Vacuum and the Collapse of Ideological Leadership  30:12 - How Conservatives Rebuild: Marriage, Institutions, and Culture  43:44 - The Victim Mentality Is a Social Contagion  1:07:06 - What Fame, Money, and Power Do to Young Influencers  1:26:03 - Leading Your Audience vs. Surrendering to It  1:31:37 - Preview: Why Should I Be Catholic? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices