First, the plaintiff purchased twin bed frames for her daughters from the defendant. However, the bed frames were too short, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant insists she sold the plaintiff her childhood bed frames, and she was up front about the shorter size. Then, the plaintiff was riding his motorcycle when the defendant?s car was stopped, blocking traffic. The plaintiff tried to stop but ran into the defendant and is suing for damages. The defendant argues she was backing out of her driveway when the plaintiff sped into her vehicle. Therefore, she believes the accident was the plaintiff?s fault. The defendant is countersuing for damage to her car. Plus, The plaintiff rented an apartment from the defendant, who still had his stuff in the place. The plaintiff had to leave due to the home?s condition and is suing for her money back. The defendant insists the plaintiff moved out of the blue and denies owing her anything. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff loaned the defendant, a former business partner, money for products for his store. However, the defendant has avoided the plaintiff and hasn?t paid it back, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff gave him the money and is only suing him because they are no longer romantically involved. Then, the plaintiff is suing the defendant for a broker?s fee because the apartment he was moving into wasn?t ready. The defendant argues an act of God in the form of Hurricane Sandy hit, so the plaintiff moved in late. Plus, the plaintiff says his ex-girlfriend?s mother owes him money for car parts he stored behind her freezer. The defendant sold the parts, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists there were no car parts behind her freezer, and she believes the plaintiff is only suing her because her daughter broke up with him. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says he and the defendant were roommates, and there were issues right from the start. He was told the defendant wasn?t totally clean, but the defendant was in fact a heavy smoker. The plaintiff got kicked out after two months with no deposit in sight and is suing to get it back. The defendant says all he asks of tenants is to be clean, pay bills on time, and don?t do damage to the unit. Apparently, the plaintiff didn?t follow any of those, and he doesn?t owe money. Then, the plaintiffs say they provided temporary housing to the defendant?s cats after some bad storms. The cats brought pesky little fleas with them, and the plaintiffs had to get an exterminator to solve the issue, but the defendant is refusing to pay them back. The defendant says she got flea medication AND provided flea extermination bombs for the plaintiffs? home, but they decided to get the exterminator on their own. A lawyer told her she was being bullied for money, and she doesn?t owe anything. Plus, The plaintiff claims he bought a car from the defendant, who knowingly sold him a lemon. Three catalytic converters in the engine were blown and he wants his money back, so he?s suing. The defendant says the plaintiff bought the car with a warranty, and he did the right thing by repairing the car after the issues came up. He does not believe he owes any money. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff has been neighbors with the defendant for the past four years. He says he provided her two loans when she needed some financial help, but she?s never paid him back. He says she even made a pass at him in the hope of getting the loans forgiven. He is suing to get his money back. The defendant claims that the plaintiff was the one to make several moves, not her. She was led to believe the money was gifts, not loans. Then, the plaintiff says she confronted her husband about his affair while at a party. She says the defendant, her husband?s mistress, followed her out to her car and beat on the vehicle with a shoe, causing extensive damage. She is suing for the $7,200 she?s owed for repairs. The defendant says the plaintiff has been harassing her for years because she had a child with the husband and is now a woman scorned. She claims it was the plaintiff who stormed into the party and tried to blame the car damage on her, but she didn?t do any of it. She owes nothing. She is countersuing for pain and suffering. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff sold the defendant an authentic collector?s edition New England Patriots jersey. Two months later, the defendant reached out and said he wanted to return it because he didn?t think it was real. The plaintiff stands behind his business, so he wired back the money, only to not receive the jersey from the defendant. He is suing to get the cost of the item back. The defendant says he?s been collecting jerseys for 10 years, and the plaintiff gave him both a fake name and a fake check. The plaintiff is just a con artist. Then, the plaintiff says he was driving down the road one day when the defendant?s dog dashed out in front of him, and he was hit by the car. The dog then ran off, leaving behind the plaintiff and a car with a damaged bumper. He says the defendant refuses to believe her dog caused the damage and won?t pay the plaintiff for repairs. He is suing for the repairs. The defendant says the plaintiff is just trying to get money out of her and bumpers don?t cost what he?s charging to repair. Plus, the plaintiff and her boyfriend rented an apartment from the defendant, and she couldn?t afford the rent anymore after they broke up. Since she was on a month-to-month lease, she moved out and is now having a hard time getting the security deposit back, so she?s suing. The defendant says the plaintiff and her boyfriend ruined the apartment by getting gum in the carpet and tearing up the linoleum flooring in the kitchen. He believes he has every right to hold on to the security deposit. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff met the defendant when she was a go-go dancer at a club. They used to date and got engaged, but they broke up due to the defendant?s cheating ways. The plaintiff is suing for the return of his engagement ring. The defendant argues the plaintiff is an abusive man. When they split up, the defendant insists the plaintiff told her she could keep the ring. Then, the plaintiff says he sold a vehicle to the defendants, but they stopped payment on a check, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendants insist the car was a piece of junk, and they?re countersuing for storage fees. Plus, the plaintiff says she was wiped out after Hurricane Sandy, and everything from the apartment she rented was gone. The plaintiff had to move out. The defendant promised to return the security deposit, but the check was short, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff left a bunch of her wet belongings behind, so the defendant believes she had every right to withhold some money. The defendant is countersuing for the cost to remove the belongings. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff hired the defendant to paint his plane. However, the paint doesn?t match the fabric, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant argues the plaintiff is just impossible to please, and everything matches just fine. Then, the plaintiff purchased an unhealthy Rottweiler from the defendant. There were so many issues with the dog, the plaintiff wants to return him. The plaintiff is suing for the value of the dog and vet bills. The defendant argues the plaintiff was thrilled when she first got the puppy but changed her mind after having to deworm him. Plus, the plaintiff legally parked his BMW and found out the defendant illegally towed it, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant claims the plaintiff?s tags were expired, so he denies owing. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff was hired by the defendant, who he alleges stopped paying him, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues he caught the plaintiff trying to steal on the job, and they got into a fistfight. The defendant is countersuing for items the plaintiff never returned. Then, the plaintiff booked a trip through the defendant. There was a change in itinerary, and the plaintiff had to foot a hotel bill unexpectedly, so she?s suing the defendant. The defendant argues the airline changed the itinerary last minute, not him. The defendant says he has no control over the situation and denies owing. Plus, the plaintiff says he bought a vacation house one week before Hurricane Sandy. The plaintiff hired and paid the defendant to make repairs. However, he learned the defendant didn?t know what he was doing and is suing for a refund. The defendant insists he had every intention of doing the job, but the plaintiff wasn?t happy with the cost. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says the defendant stole valuable items from her aunt?s apartment as she was dying in the hospital, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists she didn?t steal anything. The defendant is countersuing for pain and suffering. Then, the plaintiff says her cousin, the defendant, lived with her. The defendant got mad during a party one time and threw a brick through a window, so the plaintiff is suing for the damages. The defendant argues she already paid her cousin for the window. Plus, The plaintiff says the defendant fell into his car, denting it, so he is suing. The defendant insists her brother pushed her into the car, so the damages aren?t her fault. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff claims she was hired by the defendant for painting services but is still owed money, so he?s suing. The defendant insists she kept a strict log of all of the plaintiff?s work hours, and the plaintiff is lying. Then, the plaintiff says the defendant did some work on his car but botched the job, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant claims the plaintiff?s complaints have to do with the paint job, not the work he had done. Plus, the plaintiff rented a room in the defendants? apartment, but she had to move out due to issues with the bathroom. The plaintiff is suing for rent. The defendants argue the plaintiff kept monopolizing their private bathroom for 90 minutes at a time, so they had to put a 30-minute limit on it. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff owns a high-end breastfeeding equipment company, and the defendant purchased a pump online from her. She got a confirmation of delivery, and then two weeks later the defendant said it was never delivered. The package ended up at the defendant?s mother?s house, and the defendant disputed the charge for the product. Now the plaintiff doesn?t have the money and the defendant has the breast pump, so the plaintiff is suing. Then, the plaintiff says he parked his vehicle in the loading dock of the building he?s worked at for over a year, but the manager of the building called the defendant and had it towed. When the defendant investigated the event, he discovered the defendant actually broke into the vehicle, hotwired it, and drove it to his tow yard! He is suing the defendant for the cost of the tow and damages. The defendant says his business has been around for 20 years, and they did the tow job correctly, so they don?t owe anything. Plus, the defendant was the plaintiff?s landlord for three years, and just as the plaintiff was about to move out, Hurricane Sandy hit, forcing her to stay in place for a little longer. The defendant is now giving her a hard time over returning the security deposit, so she?s suing to get it back. The defendant claims the plaintiff kept stalling on her moveout date, and even left property behind, so he was owed a portion of the security deposit. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says he was hired by the defendant to drive her client around town for three days while he was there for a jazz performance. He also booked a hotel room for the client with his money under the reassurance he would be reimbursed. He didn?t get reimbursed and did not get paid the agreed-upon fee for driving the client around, so he?s suing. The defendant claims the plaintiff was a blabbermouth who made the client uncomfortable almost to the point of canceling his performance. She says she doesn?t owe the plaintiff for a job done poorly. Then, the plaintiff put down a deposit on a used piano the defendant was selling, but after further consideration decided not to purchase it due to damage on the instrument. The defendant never returned the $300 deposit, so she?s suing to get it back. The defendant says the plaintiff came to see the piano on three separate occasions, and the damage is simply fading from sun exposure and it?s in great mechanical shape. Plus, the plaintiff says she loaned the defendant money to take her daughter to Disneyland, but the plaintiff never expected to be stiffed on the return. She says it was clear the money was a loan, not a gift, and she wants her money back. The defendant claims the plaintiff had told her not to worry if she couldn?t return the money, so she?s surprised it?s come to being sued. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, an aunt and her lover agreed to watch the plaintiff?s Chihuahua for her, but when she came to pick the pet up, they refused to return the dog to her! The defendants are trying to get away with stealing her pet, so she?s suing for $5,000, the cost of her dog, and any future breeding income. The defendants claim they were given the dog to watch while the plaintiff was in rehab, and the plaintiff got kicked out for bad behavior. She reportedly told them to just keep the dog since she had to enter a halfway house and never even gave them money for his care. Then, the plaintiff received multiple phone calls from the defendant telling her she might be at risk of a fire because her chimney looked to be in terrible condition. She agreed to have him look at the chimney, and he pointed out a piece that was installed incorrectly. She got nervous, signed a contract with him, and later changed her mind about getting the repairs done. She canceled in the allotted time, but he won?t return her deposit, so she?s suing. The defendant says the only thing he heard from her was that she wanted to get other estimates, and didn?t get a cancellation until the day before the job. He has every right to keep the deposit. Plus, the plaintiff was proceeding through a four-way stop when the defendant drove into his driver?s side wheel, causing damage. Since the defendant was at fault, he?s certainly responsible for the cost of repairs, but he?s refusing to pay up. The plaintiff is suing for these costs of repairs. The defendant says the accident was certainly the plaintiff?s fault, and he?s lucky neither he nor his 7-year-old were injured. The plaintiff is countersuing for the cost of his deductible. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff was at a friend?s apartment complex for a party when she went outside to give her two service dogs a bathroom break. The defendant reportedly told her there were no pets allowed, instigating an argument because they?re service animals. The plaintiff is suing for pain and suffering due to discrimination. The defendant doesn?t understand the concern because he owns the property and he?s allowed to do with it what he pleases. Then, the plaintiff says he loaned money to the defendant, who?s a friend of a friend. Now the guy won?t pay him back for what is rightfully his and even says the plaintiff is harassing him. The defendant claims the plaintiff is just a liar trying to extort money from him that he doesn?t owe. Plus, the plaintiff rented a commercial space from the defendant for 20 years and says he?s been refused the return of his security deposit. He?s suing to get it back. The defendant says the plaintiff was a good tenant for the most part, but the security deposit was needed to repair all the damages he left behind, so the defendant owes nothing. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff took his truck to the defendant?s shop for repairs, only to get a call several weeks later from the cops saying it had been stolen and was currently at impound. The defendant went to get the car back and refused to return it to the plaintiff unless he was repaid for the cost of release. The defendant says the plaintiff wanted to sell the car, but the defendant wasn?t interested since he couldn?t provide a title. The car was left on the street, and the plaintiff became threatening. He says he helped the guy out by getting it back from impound. Then, the plaintiff, who was friends with the defendant?s son, was leaving the defendant?s house one day when their two dogs attacked him. He claims one went for his throat, and he says he?s lucky to still be alive. He?s suing the defendant for the amount he owes in medical bills. The defendant says the plaintiff was high on pot when the event happened, and she had told him to stay in the room he was in because she was letting her dogs out. He didn?t listen and went outside anyway. He admits to kicking one of the dogs, which caused the attack. Since the dog was trained as a guard dog, she?s not responsible for any damages. Plus, the plaintiff rented a house from the defendant, but after Hurricane Sandy hit, it became uninhabitable. Now the defendant is refusing to return the security deposit, and the plaintiff wants it back, so he?s suing. The defendant claims that the damages caused to the house had no impact on the floor the plaintiff lived on, but he decided to move out anyway. He claims the plaintiff left the unit a mess with lots of his own damages, giving the defendant every reason to keep the security deposit. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff allowed her niece to live in her home with her, but now owes her rent. Her own family is disrespecting her, so she?s suing for the rent she deserves. The defendant says she?s lived in that house since long before her aunt took over the family finances and has never once been asked to pay rent. She?s a minister and doesn?t come from a place of hate. The plaintiff put down a deposit on the yoga studio the defendant was selling, but something felt off after the defendant?s wife hired her to be a yoga instructor. When she learned the studio hadn?t made money in five years, she decided she didn?t want to purchase it anymore. He won?t return the deposit, so she?s suing. The defendant says he was originally selling the place for much more but dropped the price after Hurricane Sandy hit. He claims the plaintiff originally took that deal but backed out because she didn?t have the money, not for other reasons. He doesn?t think he owes her a refund. The plaintiff brought a leather coat to the defendant for repair work on the buttons, which were loose. When she picked it up, however, the buttons were still loose, and there was a puncture in the leather. She is suing the defendant for the money she spent on repairs and the cost of travel to court. The defendant says he?s been in business for 40 years and comes from Italy, so he knows what he?s doing. He claims he was brought a vinyl jacket, not a leather one, and did the best work he could to repair it. He?s ready to defend his reputation. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff claims the defendant?s big dog attacked her small dog, Nemo. The dog required stitches and needed part of his tail amputated. She claims the defendants never apologized and promised to reimburse her for the vet bills, but they haven?t done it, so she?s suing. The defendants argue their dog isn?t vicious at all. They say the plaintiff?s dog instigated the interaction, and their dog was just defending herself. Then, the plaintiff hired the defendant to put up a fence on her property. She claims the defendant didn?t install it property and the wind knocked it over a few weeks later. She?s suing for her money back. The defendant argues the plaintiff bought cheap material, so it?s not his fault. Plus, the plaintiff was reading a book in her car when her car started shaking. She claims the defendant hit her vehicle with his van because he tried to squeeze into a parking space. She?s suing for damages. The defendant argues the plaintiff was the one pulling out of her parking space. He argues it?s not his fault. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff hired the defendant to do work at his house. He claims the defendant broke knobs on his clothing dryer. He?s suing for the cost. The defendant claims he bought new knobs, but the plaintiff became impossible to work with. Then, the plaintiff was going to rent an apartment from the defendant, but she claims it was a fire trap because there was only one way in and one way out. She can?t get her deposit back, so she?s suing for rent and moving expenses. The defendant doesn?t think he owes the plaintiff because she lived in the apartment for two months. Plus, the plaintiff placed a deposit on a van at the defendant?s used car dealership. He returned a week later with the balance, but the van was gone. He says the defendant sold the van to someone else, so he?s suing for his money back. The defendant claims the plaintiff called and said he was having financial issues. He told the plaintiff he could apply the deposit to another van. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff bought the defendant a new phone. She claims the defendant promised to pay her back, but then he took out more phone lines without telling her and never paid. She?s suing for the cost of the bills and cancellation charges. The defendant argues the plaintiff had a crush on him and that she added the phone lines, not him. He?s countersuing for loss of income and mental stress. Then, the plaintiff let the defendant borrow a drum machine and memory card, but now he can?t get the machine back. He?s suing for the cost of the machine and card. The defendant, a DJ, says he had to pawn the machine because he fell on hard times. He argues he told the plaintiff he would pay him back, but now he refuses to because the plaintiff slandered him online. Plus, the plaintiff helped the defendant buy a new car when the defendant got into an accident. He claims the defendant fell on hard times financially, so she gave it to her son, who then totaled it. He?s suing for car fees. The defendant argues she isn?t involved in the deal because the plaintiff made the agreement with her son, not her. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff brings his neighbors to court. He says the defendant?s tree crashed through his fence onto his property, which is the third time it has happened. He?s suing for damages. The defendant argues the tree came down during Hurricane Sandy. He called insurance, but there was a delay because of the storm. He?s countersuing for lost wages. Then, the plaintiff says her stepdaughter called the plaintiff?s husband in tears asking for a loan because she was going to be homeless. She still has not repaid the money, so the plaintiff is suing for what?s owed. The defendant says she asked her father for the money, not the plaintiff, and this court session is the first time she?s ever met the plaintiff. If her dad borrowed the money from the plaintiff, how is that the defendant?s fault? Plus, the plaintiff claims a driver from the defendant?s waste management company backed into his fence, causing lots of damage. He says the defendant, who owns the company, has refused to return his calls, and he just wants his fence fixed. He is suing for the repairs. The defendant claims there was no contact made with the fence, which was already old and falling apart. He thinks it?s a shakedown. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says he gave the defendant a first-generation iPod to repair for him. When he went to pick it up, however, the defendant was hiding from him, and the iPod was broken and all his songs were gone. He is suing for the price of a new iPod and all the songs he lost. The defendant claims he was paid to run a diagnostics test on the iPod, and when he discovered the damages, he was told to simply transfer the music to a hard drive, which failed. Then, the plaintiff and defendant were good friends. She says she gave the defendant money to purchase a car for her, but the defendant botched the job and failed to get the car. The plaintiff now wants her money back from the defendant. The defendant says she knew a guy who was going to buy the car from an auction, and the plaintiff gave her money to him. He ran off with the money and she isn?t at fault for the missing money. Plus, the plaintiff says his neighbor had a leak, which got into the plaintiff?s rental apartment and caused damage. He also claims the defendant originally agreed to pay for repairs, but then backed off, saying it wasn?t his responsibility. The plaintiff now has mold in his unit and is suing for the cost of repairs. The defendant says he looked high and low for a water leak, but couldn?t find anything, so he doesn?t know what leak the plaintiff is talking about. He hasn?t had water problems in his nine years of being there. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff used to employ the defendant as a doorman at his bar and grill, then the guy got arrested. The plaintiff posted his bail to get him out but hasn?t seen the money repaid. It wasn?t a gift, and he?s suing to get the money back. The defendant says he got arrested after breaking up a fight, and one of the individuals attacked him instead. He wasn?t even a bouncer and he was just defending himself. He doesn?t owe anything to the plaintiff. Then, the plaintiff says she was nothing but the best of tenants for the defendants for five years, and since she?s moved out, they?ve been nothing but trouble. She?s been trying to get her deposit back but hasn?t had any luck, so she?s suing. The defendant says the plaintiff?s cat caused damage to the unit, and she never paid the pet fee, so the security deposit has gone to repairs. They don?t owe anything. Plus, the plaintiff claims he moved a stove, put in water lines, and installed an ice machine for a friend of the defendant. He now says he hasn?t been paid the labor fee for his work, and that the defendant is a con man. He is suing for the money he is owed. The defendant says he?s known the plaintiff for 10 years and he didn?t make any deal with him. He just introduced the plaintiff to his friend to help him out, so he owes nothing. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says the defendant cabled two trees together that were on her property, which eventually caused one of the trees to split. Now, she?s being forced to cut the tree down because her neighbor complained to the city about it. She believes the defendant should pay for it and is suing for the cost of cutting down the tree. The defendant says he did the job he was hired to do, and the damage to the plaintiff?s tree was caused by Hurricane Sandy, not his cable work. Then, the plaintiff claims he gave the defendant money to purchase a car, and suddenly the man told him he was robbed and all the money was stolen. The plaintiff didn?t believe the story and is suing to get his money back. The defendant says he was robbed at gunpoint right after withdrawing the cash from the bank, and the police investigation is ongoing. Since he was doing the plaintiff a favor, he says he owes him nothing. Plus, the plaintiff needed some handyman work done on her home, which she hired the defendant to do. She says he gave her the runaround for weeks, and the work he did was terrible. Since she?s a hardworking single mother, she?s suing to get her money back. The defendant says he was down with the flu, so he couldn?t complete the tasks in the original timeframe. When he did show up to complete the work, the plaintiff told him not to bother. Since he?d already purchased the materials for the tasks, he doesn?t believe he owes her anything. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff has known the defendant since high school. The plaintiff gave the defendant $100 to help her move out of her apartment. Instead, the defendant allegedly used the money to run her own personal errands. The plaintiff asked for her money back, but the defendant blocked her calls, so she's suing. The defendant insists the money was a gift. Then, the plaintiff hired the defendant to apply a tattoo on her body, but he messed the whole thing up, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff loved the tattoo when she left the shop. He's not responsible for her change of heart. Plus, the plaintiff has known the defendant since high school. The plaintiff gave the defendant $100 to help her move out of her apartment. Instead, the defendant allegedly used the money to run her own personal errands. The plaintiff asked for her money back, but the defendant blocked her calls, so she's suing. The defendant insists the money was a gift. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff hired the defendant to reupholster her couch, but she botched the job, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant insists she offered to redo the couch, but the plaintiff refused and stopped payment on the check. Besides, the defendant believes the piece of furniture looks great. Then, the plaintiff hired the defendant's moving company. However, many of his items were broken in the process, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists the plaintiff didn't follow his instructions. The defendant offered to help repair the belongings, but the plaintiff refused. Plus, the plaintiff says his car was illegally towed by the defendant and is now missing, so he's suing. The defendant claims the car didn't have any plates on it, so she towed it, and it was sold at auction. The defendant did her job by the book. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff claims his daughter owes him for an outstanding phone bill, so he's suing. The defendant argues her mother offered to help her out by opening an account for a phone. Everything was fine until her father flipped out one day out of the blue. The plaintiff says her daughter married the defendant's son after only three months of dating. The marriage lasted three weeks. The plaintiff is suing the defendant for the cost of the wedding dress, alterations, and the diamond ring the defendant has yet to return. The defendant claims she mailed back the ring. As far as the dress is concerned, the defendant says the plaintiff's daughter left it abandoned at her house, so she threw it out. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff wrote a book and often googles herself. The plaintiff claims the defendant ripped off some of her work and posted it online, so she's suing for copyright infringement. The defendant says he cited the plaintiff every time he posted her writings. Then, the plaintiff took his Jeep to the defendant's shop for a paint job. However, it turned out terrible, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund and the cost to have it repainted. The defendant says the plaintiff had no complaints when he picked up his vehicle. The defendant would have redone the job if he had known how unhappy the plaintiff was. Plus, the plaintiff used to rent from the defendant. However, the defendant refuses to return his security deposit and is charging him bogus late fees, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff moved out late and left the home in shambles, so she denies owing a dime. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiffs say they helped managed the defendant with his music career, but he hasn't yet paid them, so the plaintiffs are suing. The defendant argues the plaintiffs upped their prices in the middle of their work and didn't deliver. Then, the plaintiff was driving when the defendant threw a piece of wood that hit her car. The plaintiff is suing the defendant for damages caused during the incident. The defendant insists he never threw a piece of wood at the plaintiff's car. Plus, the plaintiff was driving down the road when the defendant made an illegal turn and hit her vehicle. The plaintiff claims the defendant doesn't have insurance, so she's suing. The defendant insists the plaintiff is the one who slammed into him, and he didn't have any damage to his car. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff used to date the defendant, and they lived together. The plaintiff claims the defendant up and moved out of the home, abandoning her portion of rent, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists she had to move out because the plaintiff had a naked woman in the apartment. Then, the plaintiff purchased a television from the defendant's website, but it arrived with a crack, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant claims the plaintiff didn't call him until two weeks after it arrived and denies responsibility for the damage. Plus, the plaintiffs, the owners of a community garden, hired the defendants to help maintain it, but they backed out of the deal, so the plaintiffs are suing for reimbursement. The defendants argue they offered to help but were waiting on a grant from the county, and they did a lot more work than what was promised. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff took her vehicle to the defendant's shop for a paint job, but it turned out to be the wrong color, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant says the plaintiff's insurance company paid to paint the panel, not blend it in. He was just contracted to do what he did. Then, the plaintiff gave the defendant, a bail bondsman, money to get her boyfriend out of jail. However, the defendant owes the plaintiff money for the remaining bail, so she's suing. The defendant argues he is well within his rights to keep the money the plaintiff is suing for. Plus, the plaintiff moved in with the defendant and rented a room in his house. However, the defendant demanded the plaintiff move out and onto the street, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists the plaintiff snuck out of the house in the middle of the night and didn't even say he was leaving. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says she hired the defendant to handle a roach infestation in her home, and while he showed up three or four times, the problem wasn?t fixed. He reportedly stopped answering her calls and now her home is infested again. She is suing him for the money she paid to put it toward another company to fix the problem. The defendant says he was ready and willing to fulfil their contract and even did the work. The plaintiff was impatient and wouldn?t give his job time to work. Just because she found someone cheaper doesn?t mean she?s owed a refund. Then, the plaintiff claims that the defendant, her ex-boyfriend, deposited two bad checks into her bank account, and now that they?ve split, he?s refusing to pay her back. She?s suing him for the money she deserves. The defendant claims he was asked to deposit the checks by the plaintiff, so she?s the one at fault for having faulty checks. He even says she told him to withdraw $600 for himself. He claims she?s only suing him because he broke up with her. Plus, the plaintiff hired the defendant to refinish his classic car, but when he went to pick it up, he found a piece missing and the rest of the job done incorrectly. The defendant made no attempt to correct the issue, so the plaintiff is suing for the money he spent. The defendant claims the plaintiff took one look at the job and left with the car, never giving a single complaint about the job done. He also says the lawsuit is odd because parts are not as expensive as the plaintiff is claiming. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiffs rented a house from the defendant and soon had the defendant?s family wandering in and out as if they lived there. The plaintiffs moved and have yet to be given their security deposit back, much less a reason why it?s been withheld. They are suing for the return of their security. The defendants say they had painted the unit with the understanding the plaintiffs would be staying a year, but instead they up and left only six weeks after moving in. The defendants are keeping the deposit to cover the cost of the paint job. Then, the plaintiff says the defendant, his taxman, made a mistake on his tax return forms, causing him to pay more in interest than he should have. He has no problem paying what he owes to the IRS but doesn?t think he should pay for the additional $900 in interest from the mistake. He is suing the defendant as a result to get his money back. The defendant argues that the mistake was not his but the government?s, and the plaintiff really has an issue with them. Plus, the plaintiff took his truck to the defendant to have the heater repaired, but when he got it back, the signal lights and brake lights didn?t work. He took it back to the defendant, and the second time he picked it up, he found his emergency lights would turn on when he signaled turning right. He is suing for the cost of getting his wiring redone. The defendant says he tested everything to make sure it was working, and it was. The complaints were for electrical issues, which he doesn?t even do. He?s innocent of any issues caused. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says she had agreed to rent an apartment from the defendant, who promised the current tenant had been evicted and the place was ready on January 1. When the plaintiff went to pick up her keys at the end of December, she found the previous tenant was still there and refusing to leave. The plaintiff is standing up for her rights and suing for the return of the rent she paid. The defendant says she thought the plaintiff would be a perfect fit for her unit but was mistaken. She says the plaintiff is crazy and has been making wild accusations against her for a while. Since no money was exchanged, she doesn?t owe the plaintiff anything. Then, the plaintiff says the defendant is a scoundrel who sold him a car with a fried engine and is suing to get his money back. The defendant says the plaintiff took the car for a test drive and liked it, so he put down a deposit. All he knows is he sold the plaintiff a perfectly fine car, and nothing was wrong at the time of sale. Plus, the plaintiff has been using the defendant?s shipping company for a year, and one of his packages has gone missing. The defendant supposedly handles many packages a day and didn?t have time to check delivery on just the one. The plaintiff wants to be reimbursed for the lost merchandise and is suing. The defendant says he has packages delivered to his store for clients all the time and has records of each one. The ?missing package? was never logged in his books, despite the plaintiff saying it had been delivered, so he says he?s not at fault for a shipping mistake. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff was driving home in a camper when the defendant slammed into her. The defendant sped off, so the plaintiff is suing for damages. The defendant insists the plaintiff is the one who caused the accident. The defendant is countersuing for damages. Then, the plaintiff rented an apartment from the defendant, but he hasn't returned her security, so she's suing. The defendant says the plaintiff seemed like the perfect tenant, but her boyfriend came over late at night. The defendant believes if anyone is owed money, it's him. The defendant is countersuing for past due rent. Plus, the plaintiff spoke with the defendant, a lawyer, about some trouble her son got into. The defendant charged her but didn't do anything, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant argues he was hired by the plaintiff and drafted a letter to the cops. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiffs say the defendants threw brush over their fence and into their yard, so they're suing because they hired someone to clean up the mess. The defendants argue the plaintiffs threatened them. They're countersuing for lost wages and time spent gathering evidence for court. Then, the plaintiff, a real estate broker, brought clients to see the defendant's apartment. The defendant kept pushing the move-in date, so the plaintiff's clients changed their minds and sued her. The plaintiff is now suing the defendant for money she had to shell out. The defendant says she rushed her butt off to have the place ready and it was. On the move-in date, the plaintiff's clients changed their minds, but that's not her fault. Plus, the plaintiff says the defendant improperly towed his vehicle and caused damage in the process, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant denies wrecking the vehicle and used a dolly. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff purchased a kitten from the defendant, but it had a bunch of health issues, so the plaintiff is suing for vet bills. The defendant argues he has already given the plaintiff $1,000 and even offered to treat the kitten at his own vet. Then, the plaintiff says he hired the defendant to retile a bathroom, but he messed up the shower enclosure, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant admits he damaged the shower enclosure, but they made a deal that he wouldn't have to pay the rest of his wages. Plus, the plaintiff built a trailer for his daughter, but the defendants stole it, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendants insist they purchased the trailer from someone else, and they're not going to give it to the plaintiff just because he says it's his. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says she purchased an airplane ticket for the defendant, but he didn't go on the trip or pay it back, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff bought him the ticket as a gift only because she has the hots for him. Then, the plaintiff hired the defendant, a real estate broker, to find her an apartment. She paid him, but when the plaintiff went to her new apartment, the defendant and his friends were partying there. The plaintiff backed out of the deal and is suing for her money back. The defendant argues he is the one who changed his mind because he determined the plaintiff didn't have the money to pay rent regularly. Plus, the plaintiff was parked at her bagel place when the defendant banged his door into her vehicle. The plaintiff is suing for damages. The defendant argues the winds were excessive that day, so the door hit the plaintiff's car. However, it's not his fault that the wind caused the damage. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says the defendant fell on hard times and moved in with her. However, the defendant never paid one of the electric bills she was responsible for, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists the plaintiff was supposed to pay the electric bills. Then, the plaintiff says she and the defendant dated for a while. However, the defendant owes money for multiple loans, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant admits the plaintiff gave him money here and there, but he did the same. Plus, the plaintiffs say their car broke down, so they went to the defendant's shop. However, after the job, the car still wouldn't start, so the plaintiffs are suing. The defendant argues he did everything he could to help the plaintiffs and is owed for the work he did. The defendant is countersuing for the balance owed on the repair. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff used to be in a relationship with the defendant, and they moved in together. The plaintiff claims her ex-boyfriend won?t return a television and air conditioning unit, so she?s suing for the cost of the items. The defendant argues his ex-girlfriend used his money to buy the TV and air conditioner, so he doesn?t think he owes. Then, the plaintiff brought his car to the defendant?s repair shop because he needed new tires. He claims the defendant used a sledgehammer to hit the tires, and after he got it back, his axle began smoking. He?s suing for the cost of repairs. The defendant argues the rims on the plaintiff?s truck were badly rusted, so she had to use a sledgehammer. She thinks the plaintiff is trying to sue her for a car problem that she didn?t cause. Plus, the plaintiff rented a condo near Disney World for herself, her husband, and two women she cares for. She says she had to cancel due to a last-minute health problem, but now the defendant, who owns the rental company, won?t return her deposit. She says she wants the deposit back so she can reschedule her trip for another time. The defendant claims the plaintiff called him on Christmas Eve to cancel, and he agreed to let her reschedule. He says the plaintiff demanded a refund several months later, but he doesn?t issue them. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff?s 19-year-old boyfriend has a son with the defendant, and the plaintiff, 34, is also pregnant with her boyfriend?s child. She claims the defendant keyed her car because she was angry when she found out the plaintiff was pregnant. She?s suing for car damages. The defendant admits she got upset, but claims she never keyed the plaintiff?s car. She thinks the plaintiff did it herself and is just pinning the damage on her. Then, the plaintiff boarded her horses with the defendants, and the defendants were going to sell one of the horses. She moved her horse to another location, but then the horse was found at the defendant?s barn. The plaintiff is suing for boarding costs. The defendant argues he had a free lease with the plaintiff, meaning they board it and the plaintiff pays for upkeep. They?re countersuing for equipment. Plus, the plaintiff gave the defendant a deposit for an apartment. She says the defendant never gave the money to the broker and he pocketed the money for himself. She?s suing for the money back. The defendant argues he works for the real estate agent and gets commission. He claims he never got money from the plaintiff directly. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff and defendant used to be in a relationship, and they lived together. The plaintiff says she bought a car and her ex-boyfriend took it after a few weeks. He sped over train tracks and the car went flying, causing the car to break down. She says the defendant refuses to pay her, so she?s suing for damages. The defendant argues they bought the car together. He claims the plaintiff is holding his belongings hostage and caused him to get fired. Then, the plaintiff hired the defendant to refinish his wood floors. He claims the defendant completely botched the job, so he?s suing for a refund, damages, and the cost of new flooring. The defendant argues he has been doing floors for 25 years, and the plaintiff is just one of those customers who is never happy. Plus, the plaintiff rented a house from the defendant. She says the place smelled like cat urine because the previous tenant was a cat hoarder who had 60 felines. The plaintiff claims the defendant won?t return her security deposit, so she?s suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff complained about problems from the start. He claims the plaintiff left the house a mess when she moved out, so he has every right to hold her security deposit. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff is a cab driver who took the defendant home one night. He says the defendant was drunk and didn?t pay when he got out. The plaintiff kept the defendant?s phone as collateral and ran after him, but then the defendant beat him up. He?s suing for the cost of new teeth, lost wages, and emotional distress. The defendant argues he tried to pay with a credit card, but the driver demanded cash. He says he asked the plaintiff to wait while he got cash, but then the plaintiff ran after him. He claims he was defending himself. Then, the plaintiff purchased a leather couch from the defendant?s store, but now but cushions are starting to peel. He says he took the cushion to an upholsterer, who told him it wasn?t actually leather. He?s suing for a refund. The defendant argues he special-ordered the couch for the plaintiff. Plus, the plaintiff bought it five years prior to the lawsuit. He doesn?t issue refunds, so he?s not giving the plaintiff one. Plus, the plaintiff asked the defendant to pick her up in her car, but then the defendant hit a brick wall and a woman. She says she is having problems collecting damages from the defendant, so she?s suing for the cost of the car. The defendant argues she panicked because the plaintiff yelled at her and put her dog in the backseat. She thinks the accident was the plaintiff?s fault because she distracted her. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff is a voiceover actress. She says the defendant used her voice in an ad, but he never paid her, so she?s suing. The defendant admits he asked the plaintiff to be in his commercial. He says he told the defendant he couldn?t pay her for this commercial, but he would pay her for the next one. Then, the plaintiff purchased an English bulldog puppy from the defendant?s shop. She says her puppy was extremely sick when she brought her home, so she rushed the dog to the hospital. The plaintiff claims the dog was not fit to come home because she was still sick. She?s suing for vet bills. The defendant argues his vet gave the dog a clean bill of health, so he doesn?t owe. Then, the plaintiff was parking his car in a lot near his office when an attendant driving the defendant?s car hit him. He claims the parking attendant tried to fight him, but all he wants is for the defendant who allowed the attendant to park her car to pay up. She argues there?s no damage to the car, so she doesn?t owe. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff has known the defendant for 25 years, and because the defendant works at a car dealership, she asked the defendant to help her get car insurance. She paid the defendant because he said he would help her out, but then the DMV demanded she turn in her plates for lack of insurance. She claims the defendant scammed her, so she?s suing. The defendant argues he charges a fee, but he referred her to the broker. Then, the plaintiff hired the defendant to take photographs and videos at his daughter?s Sweet 16. He claims the pictures were all dark and blurry, and when he asked the defendant about it, he started avoiding him. The plaintiff is suing for his money back, harassment, and emotional distress. The defendant argues he did a great job. He provided the plaintiff with 200 photos, but it?s not his job to do the editing. Plus, the plaintiff hired the defendant to refurbish a staircase at a residential building he bought. He claims the defendant did the work incorrectly and never filed permits. He?s suing for damages. The defendant argues the plaintiff told him he didn?t need a permit, and if it was, the plaintiff should have done it. He?s countersuing for unpaid labor and materials. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff asked the defendant to watch her dog for a few weeks because she needed to pay her pet deposit. She claims the defendant not only refuses to return the pet, but she even gave it to her stepsister, who changed the dog?s name. The plaintiff claims the defendant and the woman?s stepsister won?t give her the dog back, so she?s suing for the cost of the dog. The defendant argues the plaintiff couldn?t take care of the dog, now he?s in a better home with her stepsister. Then, the plaintiff parked her car on the street and claims the defendant crashed into her vehicle in the early hours of the morning. She says the defendant told her the car was stolen, but the plaintiff thinks the defendant did it and is making it an excuse. She?s suing for the cost of the car. The defendant argues her car was stolen and involved in an accident. She says she wasn?t anywhere near the area when the crash happened. She doesn?t think she owes. Plus, the plaintiff rented the defendant?s home for 12 years. She says the defendant kicked her out because she wanted to sell the residence, but the defendant refuses to return her security deposit. She?s suing for double the security deposit, interest, and reimbursement on repairs. The defendant argues the plaintiff moved out two months earlier than she was supposed to and didn?t tell anyone. She?s countersuing for a water bill. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiffs, a married couple, purchased a couch from the defendant. They claim the couch wasn?t authentic leather like they ordered, so they asked for a refund. The plaintiffs say the defendant agreed to give them their money back, but now he won?t, so they?re suing. The defendant argues he brought the furniture to the plaintiffs? house so they could get a feel for it, but it?s not his fault the couple couldn?t decide what they wanted. He says he never offered a refund. Then, the plaintiffs purchased a car from the defendant. They say the car had a broken steering wheel, and they?re just lucky to be alive. The plaintiffs are suing for the cost of the vehicle. The defendant argues he offered them an upgrade when they returned the first car. He says the plaintiffs destroyed the steering arm, and it?s not his fault. Plus, the plaintiff bought a French bulldog from the defendant. When he brought the dog home, he found out it had a UTI and the deadly virus parvo. The plaintiff took the puppy to the animal hospital, so now he?s suing for vet bills. The defendant doesn?t think she?s responsible because the dog had a clean bill of health when it left her house. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff bought a German shepherd puppy from the defendants? pet store. The dog got sick and learned it had a congenital defect. She?s suing for vet bills, the cost of the puppy, and dog supplies. The defendants argue the plaintiff demanded a dog for free and caused a scene in their store. Then, the plaintiff rented an illegal apartment from the defendant. She says her former landlord gave her 72 hours to vacate and even turned off her electricity, which ruined a fridge full of food. The plaintiff is suing for expenses for illegal evictions. The defendant argues he gave the plaintiff leeway when she fell behind on rent. He?s countersuing for late fees, electric bills, stealing his trailer, and a garbage truck. Plus, the plaintiff?s car was parked in a lot when she claims the defendant damaged her car while he was installing a car seat. She?s suing for the cost of the damages. The defendant argues the plaintiff claimed out of nowhere that he nicked her car, but he knows he didn?t. He said the plaintiff?s car has scratches all over the place, so he thinks the plaintiff is just pinning all the damage on him. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiffs rented an apartment to the defendant. They claim the plaintiff threw parties and left garbage everywhere. The plaintiffs say the defendant is trying to use the security deposit to pay for her last month?s rent. They?re suing for rent and additional expenses. The defendant argues the plaintiffs were always at her apartment, and she didn?t enjoy that. She?s countersuing for overpayment of rent. Then, the plaintiff wrote a book and hired the defendant to edit and publish her book. She claims the defendant is a liar and did nothing for her. She?s suing for her money back and lost wages in book sales. The defendant argues he is an award-winning book publisher who has been doing this for decades. He says he printed and delivered the books to her, so he doesn?t owe her. Plus, the plaintiff left his Kia at the defendant?s repair shop as collateral for a Jeep he bought from the defendant. He says the defendant sold his Kia behind his back. He?s suing for the cost of the Kia. The defendant argues the plaintiff brought the Kia in for repairs, but the car wasn?t even worth fixing. He told the plaintiff he had 30 days to get the Kia off his lot, and he has no idea what happened to the car. He?s countersuing for the remaining balance of the Jeep. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff and defendant have known each other since high school, and they dated for a while. He was driving the defendant?s car and got pulled over for illegally tinted windows, and he got a ticket for it. He claims his ex-girlfriend, the defendant, told him she would pay for the ticket fines, but she never did. His license got suspended and he was pulled from her insurance policy, so he?s suing. The defendant argues she never said she would cover the ticket costs. Then, the plaintiff brings his younger brother to court. Their other brother died, so the plaintiff paid for the defendant?s plane ticket to attend the funeral in Ecuador. The plaintiff says his brother hasn?t paid him back, so he?s suing. The defendant argues the ticket was a gift and he never agreed to pay. Plus, the plaintiff rented a room from the defendant after Hurricane Sandy left him homeless. He claims the defendant didn?t tell the other tenants that he had a dog, and she threatened to throw him out. He claims he refused to leave, so she shut off his utilities and threw trash all over his room. He?s suing for relocation costs. The defendant argues the plaintiff was disrespectful and other tenants moved out because of him. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff is a real estate agent who rented a store to the defendant. He says the defendant owes him a commission for the deal, so he?s suing. The defendant argues the entire lawsuit is pointless and he doesn?t owe a penny. Then, the plaintiffs purchased an Italian leather couch from the defendant. They say the couch that got delivered to them was cheap vinyl, so they want a refund. The defendant argues the plaintiffs got the couch they ordered. He thinks they?re the type of people who will never be pleased. He doesn?t offer store refunds, either. Plus, the plaintiff says her son got a ride home with the defendant. It was rainy that day, and the defendant lost control of car and crashed into a tree. The plaintiff?s son was taken to the hospital, so the plaintiff wants the defendant to cover the hospital bills. The defendant argues the plaintiff?s son begged him not to put his name on the police report. Don?t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices